[1]郑丽君*,江丽萍,何慧芳.经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(1):72-75.
　ZHENG Li-jun*,JIANG Li-ping,HE Hui-fang.Clinical study of treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy by transvaginal excision of lesion of lower uterine pregnancy segment[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(1):72-75.
点击复制

经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的临床研究
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年1期
页码:
72-75
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2017-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study of treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy by transvaginal excision of lesion of lower uterine pregnancy segment
作者:
郑丽君1*;  江丽萍2; 何慧芳1
1. 深圳市福田区妇幼保健院妇产科；2. 深圳市妇幼保健院妇产科
Author(s):
ZHENG Li-jun1*;  JIANG Li-ping2;  HE Hui-fang1
1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics，Maternal and Child Health Hospital of District Futian，Shenzhen Guangdong 518000，P.R.China；2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology，Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shenzhen City，Shenzhen Guangdong 518
关键词:
经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术; 经腹子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术; 外生型; 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠
Keywords:
transvaginal excision of lesion of lower uterine pregnancy segment;  excision of lesion of uterine scar pregnancy;  exophytic type;  cesarean scar pregnancy
摘要:
目的探讨经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(cesarean scar pregnancy，CSP)的临床效果。方法选取2011年2月至2016年1月在深圳市福田区妇幼保健院及深圳市妇幼保健院就诊的外生型CSP患者66例，其中使用经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术的30例患者为研究组，采用经腹子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术的36例患者为对照组。比较两组患者的手术情况、术后恢复情况和术后不良反应发生情况。 结果研究组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、住院费用都少于对照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；研究组患者术后肛门排气时间短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；两组人绒毛膜促性腺激素恢复至正常水平时间、月经复潮时间、病灶缩小时间比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞005）；研究组患者切口液化、阴道流血、周围组织受损等不良反应发生情况均少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）。结论经阴道子宫下段妊娠病灶切除术治疗外生型CSP的临床效果优于经腹子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术，患者损伤小，术后恢复快，不良反应少，值得临床选用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical effects of excision of lesion of lower uterine pregnancy segment by transvaginal excision in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP) and to provide a reference for the treatment of the disease. Methods66 patients with exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy and who received treatments in the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of District Futian of Shenzhen City from February 2011 to January 2016 were selected. 36 cases were treated by abdominal uterine scar pregnancy lesion resection as the control group while 30 cases were treated with excision of lesion of pregnancy by transvaginal excision as the reserch group. Operation situation, the postoperative recovery situation and the postoperative adverse reactions occurred in the two groups were compared. ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and costs of patients in the research group were less than those of the control group.The difference was statistically significant(P＜005）. The anal exhaust time after operation of patients in the research group was shorter than the control group. The difference was statistically significant(P＜005）.Time of HCG return to normal levels, menstrual cycle and lesion reduction time of the two groups were compared. The difference was not statistically significant(P>005）. The incision liquefaction, vaginal bleeding, the number of peripheral tissue damage (2 cases) of patients in the research group were less than those in the control group(a total of 7 cases). The incidence of adverse reactions in the two groups were compared.The difference was statistically significant(P＜005）. ConclusionClinical effect of excision lesion of lower uterine pregnancy segment by transvaginal excisionin treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy are better than excision of lesion of uterine scar pregnancy with less injury,rapid postoperative recovery and less adverse reactions.It is worthy to be selected clinical.

参考文献/References:

［1］马志红,赵曼曼,王丹阳经阴道病灶切除术治疗剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠临床病例分析 ［J］现代妇产科进展,2015,(10):772-774. ［2］Bodur S,zdamar U, Kul S,et al.The efficacy of the systemic methotrexate treatment in caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: A quantitative review of English literature［J］.Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research,2015,35(3):290-296. ［3］陈镘如,梅立,谢兰,等.外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠三种治疗方法的对比研究 ［J］.实用妇产科杂志,2015,31(4):278-281. ［4］柳晓春,冯敏清,黄小敏,等.经阴道子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术治疗子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床分析 ［J］.现代妇产科进展,2015,24(4):273-275. ［5］Fuchs N,Manoucheri E,Verbaan M,et al.Laparoscopic management of extrauterine pregnancy in caesarean section scar: description of a surgical technique and review of the literature ［J］.An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,2015,122(1):137-140. ［6］李亚,周琴,王世宣.29例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断及治疗方式的探讨 ［J］.中国妇产科临床杂志,2012,13(6):409-412. ［7］张艳萍,申延琴,李妍芳,等.剖宫产瘢痕处妊娠三种治疗方法临床疗效分析 ［J］.中国妇幼卫生杂志,2016,7(1):74-75. ［8］杜玲玲. 外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠不同治疗方法的随机对照研究［J］.中国现代药物应用,2016,10（6):99-100. ［9］Menakaya UA,Djordjic T,Morton R,et al.Managing Caesarean Scar Pregnancy in Low Resource Settings: 2 Case Reports and a Description of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Surgical Approach (TRUGA)［J］.African Journal of Reproductive Health,2015,19(3):27-31. ［10］张祖威,常亚杰,陈玉清.阴式子宫切口疤痕妊娠病灶清除术治疗剖宫产切口疤痕妊娠 ［J］.中山大学学报(医学科学版),2011,32(5):689-693. ［11］安海霞，吴素慧，尚海霞.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的诊治进展 ［J］.中国计划生育和妇产科，2016,8（8）：29-33. ［12］林桂花.论经阴道剖宫产瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术15例病例分析［J］.中国卫生产业,2013,(15):118-119. ［13］叶敏欢,王黎,方建华,等.经阴道子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除术与经腹子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶切除治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的效果对比 ［J］.中国当代医药,2014,21(36):40-42.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-01-25