[1]刘妍,刘宗印*,高立,等.两种手术方式治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的 临床疗效[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(11):47- 49,62.
　LIU Yan,LIU Zong-yin*,GAO Li,et al.Clinical efficacy of two surgical methods for the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(11):47- 49,62.
点击复制

两种手术方式治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的 临床疗效
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年11期
页码:
47- 49,62
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2017-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical efficacy of two surgical methods for the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy
作者:
刘妍; 刘宗印*; 高立; 薛晓玲
宝鸡市妇幼保健院妇科
Author(s):
LIU Yan; LIU Zong-yin*; GAO Li; XUE Xiao-ling
Department of Gynecology, Baoji Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital,Baoji Shaanxi 721300,P.R.China
关键词:
外生型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠; 经腹腔镜手术; 经阴道手术
Keywords:
exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy; abdominal surgery; transvaginal surgery
分类号:
R 7138
摘要:
目的探讨两种手术方式治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的临床疗效。方法选取2015年3月至2017年3月宝鸡市妇幼保健院妇科收治的64例外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠患者,用随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组各３２例，对照组采用腹腔镜手术去除瘢痕妊娠病灶，研究组采用经阴道手术去除瘢痕妊娠病灶，比较两组手术相关指标、住院费用、康复指标及并发症发生情况。结果研究组手术时间、术中出血量与治疗费用均远低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<005)。研究组住院时间较对照组短，月经恢复时间稍长于对照组，但差异无统计学意义(P>005)。研究组β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素（beta human chorionic gonadotropin，β-hCG）恢复正常时间、肛门恢复排气时间及疼痛度均低于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<005)。两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>005)。结论经阴道手术与经腹腔镜手术对外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠均有良好治疗效果，但经阴道手术对患者造成的创伤较小，恢复速度较快，并可减轻患者经济负担。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy of two surgical methods for the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.Methods64 cases of patients with exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy from March 2015 to March 2017 in Baoji Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital were selected and divided into control group(32 cases) and research group(32 cases) by random number table method.The control group were treated with abdominal surgery while research group were treated with transvaginal surgery.Indexes releated to operation,hospitalization expenses,recovery and complications between the two groups were compared. ResultsThe operative time, intraoperative blood loss and treatment cost were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P<005). The hospital stay was lower in the study group than in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P> 005).β-hCG recovery time,anal exhaust time and pain of research group were lower than control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<005).There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).ConclusionAbdominal surgery and transvaginal surgery both have good clinical effects in the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. However, vaginal surgery on the patients caused less trauma and faster recovery. It also reduce the economic burden of patients.

参考文献/References:

［1］罗燕，庄元.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的临床诊治分析(附72例临床病例分析)　［J］.中国现代医学杂志，2013，23（5）：104-107. ［2］吴晓婷，步仰高.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕部位妊娠的研究现状和进展　［J］.安徽医学，2015，36（8）：1040-1043. ［3］WANG Guangwei, LIU Xiaofei, BI Fangfang, et al.Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic resection for the management of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy　［J］.Fertility and Sterility, 2014, 101(5): 1501-1507. ［4］陆宣平，陈友国，韩冰.剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的研究进展　［J］.实用妇产科杂志，2014，30 （4）：260-262. ［5］杨文兰，王金玲，张运平.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠保守治疗时出血的影响因素探讨　［J］.现代妇产科进展，2014，12（5）：383-384. ［6］ZDAMAR , DOGER E, ARLIER S, et al.Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancies managed by suction curettage alone or in combination with other therapeutic procedures: A series of 33 cases and analysis of complication profile　［J］.The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2016, 42(8): 927-935. ［7］林春丽，廖湘玲，聂岚，等.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的四种治疗方法的临床效果　［J］.南方医科大学学报，2015，21（12）：1787-1791. ［8］石彩萍，李斌.腹腔镜治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠临床分析　［J］.中国妇幼保健，2013，28（11）：1814-1817. ［9］王雪莲，张华.经阴道和经腹腔镜两种手术方式治疗外生型剖宫产瘢痕部妊娠的临床疗效　［J］.中国性科学，2016，25（11）：123-125. ［10］周金华，陈友国.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠69例临床分析　［J］.中国妇幼保健，2014，29（33）：5372-5374. ［11］吕冰清，谢熙，刘超斌.176例剖宫产疤痕部位妊娠治疗方式选择及预后分析　［J］.生殖与避孕，2016，36（3）：240-244. ［12］陈光元，黄平，谢家滨，等.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的腹腔镜手术与阴式手术临床效果比较　［J］.海南医学，2015，26（24）：3710-3712. ［13］任江虹，王丽.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠52例诊治分析　［J］.中国实验诊断学，2016，20（4）：667-669. ［14］王智慧，李苑艳，吕杰强.三种方法治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的临床分析　［J］.生殖与避孕，2014，34（12）：1021-1025. ［15］赵岩岩，杜佳秋，朴英兰，等.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的两种治疗方法比较　［J］.解放军医学院学报，2017，38（1）：19-21.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-25