[1]王凤玲*,周义文,王亮.孕早期白细胞计数、肝功指标检测与妊娠期糖尿病 发生的相关性分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(12):41- 44,52.
　WANG Feng-ling*,ZHOU Yi-wen,WANG Liang.Detection of white blood cell count and liver function detection in early pregnancy and their correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(12):41- 44,52.
点击复制

孕早期白细胞计数、肝功指标检测与妊娠期糖尿病 发生的相关性分析
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
41- 44,52
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2017-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Detection of white blood cell count and liver function detection in early pregnancy and their correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus
作者:
王凤玲*; 周义文; 王亮
绵阳市中心医院妇产科
Author(s):
WANG Feng-ling*;  ZHOU Yi-wen;  WANG Liang
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang Sichuan 621000,P.R. China
关键词:
妊娠期糖尿病; 白细胞计数; 谷氨酸氨基转移酶; 天冬氨酸氨基转移酶
Keywords:
gestational diabetes mellitus;  white blood cell;  alanine aminotransferase;  aspartate aminotransferase
分类号:
R 714256
摘要:
目的对孕早期外周血白细胞计数（white blood cell, WBC）、丙氨酸氨基转移酶（alanine aminotransferase，ALT）和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶（aspartate aminotransferase， AST）水平进行监测,并分析其与妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus，GDM)发生的相关性。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年1月在绵阳市中心医院确诊为GDM的孕妇156例的病历资料（GDM组），随机选取同期正常糖耐量（normal glucose tolerance，NGT）孕妇156例为对照（NGT组），比较两组孕妇的一般资料、血常规和肝功能指标，采用二分类Logistic回归分析，探究WBC、ALT和AST水平与GDM发生的相关性，受试者工作特征曲线评价WBC、ALT和AST单独及联合预测GDM的效果。结果两组平均年龄和孕前体质量指数（body mass index，BMI）比较差异无统计学意义（P>005），GDM组WBC（973±160）×109/L、中性粒细胞计数(745±192) ×109/L、ALT（2593±657）U/L、AST（2530±755）U/L均明显高于NGT组［（757±162）×109/L、(671±169) ×109/L、（1832±566）U/L、（1629±551）U/L］（P<005）。经多因素Logistic回归分析显示，年龄、BMI、WBC、AST和ALT是GDM发生的独立危险因素（P<005）。WBC、AST和ALT联合预测GDM发生风险的效能较高（AUC=0903，P<005），利用约登指数得出最佳截点为WBC≥931×109/L, ALT≥23 IU/L和 AST≥2134 IU/L。结论GDM患者孕早期WBC、ALT和AST水平明显升高，孕早期应用WBC、ALT和AST联合监测可为预测GDM发生风险提供新手段。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo detect the level of white blood cell(WBC), alanine aminotransferase(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase(AST), and their correlation with gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM) in early pregnancy. MethodsFrom January 2014 to January 2017, 156 patients with GDM were retrospectively analyzed in Mianyang Central Hospital，and 156 normal glucose tolerance(NGT） pregnant women were randomly chosen as control. The general information, routine analysis of blood and liver function test in GDM group and NGT group were comparatively analyzed. The two-classification logistics regression analysis was used to observe the risk factors of GDM. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate predictive value and identify optimal cut-off points for variables that were significantly associated with GDM in the logistic regression analysis. ResultsThe age and body mass index(BMI) in the GDM group were much higher than the NGT group. The WBC, neutrophil count, ALT and AST in GDM group were（973±160）×109/L, (745±192) ×109/L,（2593±657）IU/L and（2530±755）IU/L respectively, which were significantly higher than the NGT group(P<005). The age, BMI, WBC, ALT and AST were the independent risk factors for GDM. The combination of WBC, ALT and AST has a efficiency high in the prediction for GDM（AUC=0903，P<005）, and the best cut-off predictive values for GDM were 931×109/L for WBC, 2302 U/L for ALT and 2134 IU/L for ALT using Youden index in the ROC analysis. ConclusionThe levels of WBC, ALT and AST in GDM patients were significantly higher than those in GDM patients. The combination of WBC, ALT and AST in early pregnancy could provide a new way to predict the risk of GDM.

参考文献/References:

［1］HOD M, KAPUR A, SACKS D A, et al The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: a pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care ［J］. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 131(Suppl 3): S 173-S 211. ［2］王成书，魏玉梅，杨慧霞．妊娠期糖尿病孕妇不同血糖指标异常与妊娠结局的关系 ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2013，48（12）：899-902． ［3］TZUR T, WEINTRAUB A Y, SERGIENKO R, et al. Can leukocyte count during the first trimester of pregnancy predict later gestational complications? ［J］. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 287(3): 421-427. ［4］中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组．中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组.妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014) ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（8）：561-569． ［5］关怀，尚丽新．妊娠期糖尿病流行现状 ［J］．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2015，31（1）：91-94． ［6］Anon. National institutes of health consensus development conference statement: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus, March 4-6, 2013 ［J］. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 122(2 Pt 1): 358-369. ［7］姚宝林，程海东．妊娠期糖尿病的病因及发病机制 ［J］．现代妇产科进展，2014，23（1）：73-75． ［8］李松，丛林，袁静，等．TLR 4乙酰化对LPS-TLR4-NF-κB通路的影响及其在妊娠期糖尿病发病机制中的作用 ［J］．安徽医科大学学报，2016，51（1）：26-30． ［9］胡仁明，谢颖，鹿斌，等．2型糖尿病患者高发“代谢性炎症综合征” ［J］．中华内分泌代谢杂志，2016，32（1）：27-32． ［10］BUGATTO F, QUINTERO-PRADO R, VISIEDO F M, et al. The influence of lipid and proinflammatory status on maternal uterine blood flow in women with late onset gestational diabetes ［J］. Reproductive Sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2017: 1933719117698576. ［11］王媛媛，张龑，李蓉，等．妊娠早期母体肝脏代谢水平与妊娠期糖尿病的相关性 ［J］．中华糖尿病杂志，2016，8（5）：268-271． ［12］PATTANATHAIYANON P, PHALOPRAKARN C, TANGJITGAMOL S. Comparison of gestational diabetes mellitus rates in women with increased and normal white blood cell counts in early pregnancy ［J］. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2014, 40(4): 976-982. ［13］YANG Hongling, ZHU Chunyan, MA Qinling, et al. Variations of blood cells in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus ［J］. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2015, 43(1): 89-93. ［14］MARKOVA M, PIVOVAROVA O, HORNEMANN S, et al. Isocaloric diets high in animal or plant protein reduce liver fat and inflammation in individuals with type 2 diabetes ［J］. Gastroenterology, 2017, 152(3): 571. ［15］WANG Ye-li, KOH W P, YUAN Jian-min, et al. Association between liver enzymes and incident type 2 diabetes in Singapore Chinese men and women ［J］. BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2016, 4(1): e000296. ［16］KO S H, BAEG M K, HAN K D, et al. Increased liver markers are associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes ［J］. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21(24): 7478-7487.

相似文献/References:

[1]程兰.妊娠期糖代谢异常患者血清胱抑素C测定的意义[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(06):0.
　CHENG Lan Tianjin Centtal Gynaecology and Obstetrics Hospital of,Tianjin 0000,China.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(12):0.
[2]赵昆.D-二聚体测定在产科常见病理性高凝状态疾病的临床意义[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　ZHAO Kun.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(12):0.
[3]潘玥,刘巧,朱绍密,等.妊娠期糖尿病胰岛素治疗的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(06):0.
　PAN Yue,LIU Qiao,ZHU Shao-mi.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(12):0.
[4]黎凤彩,苏凌春,曾志娟,等.血清胱抑素C联合血清尿酸在监测妊娠期糖尿病发生妊娠期高血压疾病的临床意义[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(05):0.
　LI Feng-cai,SU Ling-chun,ZENG Zhi-juan,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(12):0.
[5]王国育.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇孕前体质量指数对分娩方式和新生儿体质量的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.
　WANG Guo-yu,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(12):0.
[6]赵卓姝,关海兰,何洁云,等.孕期个性化营养指导对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(08):0.
　ZHAO Zhuo-shu,GUAN Hai-lan,HE Jie-yun,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(12):0.
[7]徐辉,姜群英,韦红梅,等.个性化营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病的治疗作用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(01):0.
　XU Hui,JIANG Qun-ying,WEI Hong-mei,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(12):0.
[8]孙桢,黄立,夏勇,等.妊娠期糖尿病与核转录因子NF-κBp65相关性研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(04):0.
　SUN Zhen,HUANG Li,XIA Yong,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(12):0.
[9]杨立黔.妊娠期糖尿病诊断新标准对母婴结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(07):0.
　YANG Li-qian,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(12):0.
[10]杨金英,钟利若,刘晓英,等.小麦纤维素对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖和血脂的影响研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(10):0.
　YANG Jin-ying,ZHONG Li-ruo,LIU Xiao-ying,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(12):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-25