[1]刘利平,黄琼新*,李姣华.个性化营养干预配合孕期教育对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制及妊娠结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(10):35-38.
　LIU Li-ping,HUANG Qiong-xin*,LI Jiao-hua.Effect of individualized nutrition intervention and pregnancy education on blood glucose control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(10):35-38.
点击复制

个性化营养干预配合孕期教育对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制及妊娠结局的影响
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年10期
页码:
35-38
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of individualized nutrition intervention and pregnancy education on blood glucose control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
作者:
刘利平; 黄琼新*; 李姣华
汉川市人民医院妇产科
Author(s):
LIU Li-ping; HUANG Qiong-xin*; LI Jiao-hua
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hanchuan People 's Hospital, Xiaogan Hubei 431600, P.R.China
关键词:
个性化营养干预; 孕期教育; 妊娠糖尿病患者; 血糖控制; 妊娠结局
Keywords:
personalized nutrition intervention;  pregnancy education;  gestational diabetes mellitus;  glycemic control;  pregnancy outcome
分类号:
R 714.256
摘要:
目的探讨个性化营养干预配合孕期教育对妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖控制及妊娠结局的影响。方法选择2014年8月至2016年8月在汉川市人民医院治疗的妊娠期糖尿病患者100例，采用随机数字表法将其分为两组，对照组50例实施个性化营养干预，观察组50例在对照组基础上增加基于微信平台的孕期教育。观察两组患者依从性、血糖控制效果及分娩方式。结果干预后两组患者依从性量表各维度及总表得分均有明显提升（P<005），观察组提升幅度更为明显（P<005）。干预前两组患者空腹血糖与餐后2 h血糖比较差异无统计学意义（P>005）；干预后两组患者空腹血糖与餐后2 h血糖均明显下降（P<005），且观察组低于对照组（P<005）。对照组难产率140 %（7/50）明显高于观察组的20 %（1/50）（P<005）。结论个性化营养干预配合基于微信平台的孕期教育相对于单纯个性化营养干预可明显提升妊娠期糖尿病患者的依从性，降低患者空腹及餐后2 h血糖，降低难产率。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of personalized nutrition intervention and pregnancy education on glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods100 women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated in Hanchuan People 's Hospital from August 2014 to August 2016 were selected. They were divided into two groups according to the random number table. 50 patients in the control group were treated with personalized nutrition intervention, and others in the observation group were educated by WeChat platform on the basis of the control group. Observed the compliance，effect of blood sugar control and delivery mode of two groups. ResultsAfter intervention, each dimension and total score of compliance scale were significantly improved (P<005), but the improvement rate of the observation group was more obvious (P<005). The fasting blood glucose and postprandial 2 h blood glucose of two groups had no significant difference before intervention(P>005)，and two indexes decreased significantly after intervention，the observation group lower than the control group (P<005).The control group had a dystocia rate of 140 % (7/50), which was significantly higher than that of the observation group (20 %, 1/50)，the difference was statistically significant (P<005). ConclusionIndividualized nutrition intervention combined with WeChat platform-based pregnancy education can improve the compliance of gestational diabetes patients significantly, reduce the fasting and postprandial 2 h blood glucose, reduce the dystocia rate.

参考文献/References:

［1］Russo LM, Nobles C, Ertel KA, et al. Physical activity interventions in pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus：a systematic review and meta-analysis ［J］. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 125 (3): 576-582. ［2］李会琴，刘云，任利容．妊娠期糖尿病的流行病学调查分析 ［J］．中国妇幼保健，2015，30（11）：1744-1746． ［3］Kamana KC, Shakya S, ZHANG Hua. Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature review ［J］. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2015, 66 (2): 14-20. ［4］Olbrich S, Van Dinteren R, Arns M. Personalized medicine: review and perspectives of promising baseline EEG biomarkers in major depressive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ［J］. Neuropsychobiology, 2015, 72 (3/4): 229-240. ［5］中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组，围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组．妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南 (2014) ［J］．糖尿病临床，2014，8（11）：489-498． ［6］赵秋利，侯赛宁，梁艳，等．2型糖尿病患者饮食行为依从性测评量表的开发及信效度检验 ［J］．护理学杂志，2017，32（17）：102-105． ［7］Mwanri AW, Kinabo J, Ramaiya K, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in subSaharan Africa: systematic review and metaregression on prevalence and risk factors ［J］. Trop Med Int Health, 2015, 20 (8): 983-1002. ［8］Carolan-Oiah MC. Educational and intervention programmes for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management: An integrative review ［J］. Collegian, 2016, 23 (1): 103-114. ［9］Aune D, Sen A, Henriksen T, et al. Physical activity and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies ［J］. Eur J Epidemiol, 2016, 31 (10): 967-997. ［10］Jaskolka D, Retnakaran R, Zinman B, et al. Sex of the baby and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the mother: a systematic review and meta-analysis ［J］. Diabetologia, 2015, 58 (11): 2469-2475. ［11］Jensen LA, Chik CL, Ryan EA. Review of gestational diabetes mellitus effects on vascular structure and function ［J］. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2016, 13 (3): 170-182. ［12］肖钊，娄小平．基于微信公众平台对鼻出血患者术后护理的效果研究 ［J］．重庆医学，2017（A02）：403-405． ［13］高琴，刘国红，谢爱贞，等．运用网络微信平台对肠造口出院患者行延续护理的效果 ［J］．广东医学，2016，37（21）：3310-3313． ［14］LI Jiandong, SONG Liping, ZHOU Ling, et al. A MicroRNA signature in gestational diabetes mellitus associated with risk of macrosomia ［J］. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2015, 37 (1): 243-252. ［15］HE Xiu-jie, QIN Feng-yun, HU Chuan-lai, et al. Is gestational diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for macrosomia: a meta-analysis? ［J］. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 291 (4): 729-735.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐辉,姜群英,韦红梅,等.个性化营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病的治疗作用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(01):0.
　XU Hui,JIANG Qun-ying,WEI Hong-mei,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(10):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-25