[1]毛乐乐,席思思,陈醒,等.15 434名育龄女性备孕现状及影响因素分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(6):37-40.
　MAO Le-le,XI Si-si,CHEN Xing,et al.Analysis on the preconception status and influencing factors of 15 434 women of childbearing age[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(6):37-40.
点击复制

15 434名育龄女性备孕现状及影响因素分析
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年6期
页码:
37-40
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on the preconception status and influencing factors of 15 434 women of childbearing age
作者:
毛乐乐1; 2; 席思思2; 陈醒1; 2; 孙宇1; 白文佩1*
1. 100038北京,北京大学第九临床医学院,首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院妇产科；2. 100034北京, 北京大学第一医院妇产科
Author(s):
MAO Le-le1; 2; XI Si-si2 ; CHEN Xing1; 2; SUN Yu1; BAI Wen-pei1*
1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bejing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, The Ninth Clinical Medical College of Peking University, Beijing 100038, P.R.China；2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital
关键词:
孕前保健 ; app; 育龄女性; 横断面研究
Keywords:
preconception care;  application(app);  women of childbearing age;  cross-sectional study
分类号:
R 169.1
摘要:
目的调查中国育龄女性备孕现状及影响因素，为规范孕前保健服务提供科学依据。方法采用横断面研究方法，使用自行设计的问卷，对2015年11~12月使用某app管理月经的育龄女性进行调查，收集基本信息及备孕相关信息。结果共有15 434名育龄女性参与调查，平均年龄（2632±697）岁，备孕知识主要来源于熟人或者父母经验、网络或者专业媒体。月经规律女性和不规律女性在备孕时长和是否考虑辅助生殖上比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）。痛经女性与不痛经女性比较，在备孕知识的来源、备孕服务的选择、备孕时长、是否考虑辅助生殖等方面差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）。结论育龄女性对于孕前保健知识的来源渠道有限，政府应给予相应政策引导，扩大孕前保健服务的影响力，注重孕前保健服务内容的多样性，畅通孕前保健服务的获取渠道，规范孕前保健服务，促进生殖健康。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the preconception status and influencing factors of women of childbearing age in China, and provide a scientific basis for regulating pre-pregnancy health services. MethodsUsing a cross-sectional study method, a self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate women of childbearing age who used an app to manage menstruation from November to December 2015, collecting basic information and pregnancy-related information.ResultsA total of 15,434 women of childbearing age participated in the survey, with an average age of (2632±697) years. The knowledge of pregnancy was mainly derived from acquaintances or parental experiences, online or professional media. There was a statistically significant difference between the menstrual regularity women and the irregular women in the length of preconception and whether or not to consider assisted reproduction (P<005). Compared with women without dysmenorrhea, dysmenorrhea women had statistical significance in the source of pregnancy knowledge, choice of pregnancy services, length of preconception, and whether or not to consider assisted reproductive differences (P<005).ConclusionWomen of childbearing age have limited sources of pre-pregnancy health knowledge. The government should give corresponding policy guidance, expand the influence of pre-pregnancy health services, pay attention to the diversity of pre-pregnancy health care services, smooth access to pre-pregnancy health services, regulate pre-pregnancy health services, and promote reproduction health.

参考文献/References:

［1］贺月芳，韩磊．孕前保健与咨询的研究进展 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2016，8（10）：23-27． ［2］Frayne DJ. Preconception care is primary care: a call to action ［J］. Am Fam Physician, 2017, 96(8): 492-494. ［3］Genuis RA, Genuis SJ. Preconception care: the next frontier for improving maternal-child health care ［J］. Public Health, 2017, 149(8): 57-59. ［4］张军，高云飞，黄莺莺．孕前保健服务的现状调查及建议 ［J］．护理管理杂志，2012，12（2）：90-91． ［5］王媛媛，马旭．出生缺陷干预从产前优生服务到孕前保健的模式转变 ［J］．中国计划生育学杂志，2012，20（8）：573-575． ［6］张雯，徐宏燕，闫明，等．北京市育龄夫妇孕前保健需求现状定性调查 ［J］．中国妇幼健康研究，2011，22（4）：503-505． ［7］刘小凤，刘小雅，宋秀玲，等．深圳市宝安区孕前保健现状及需求调查 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2015,7（2）：71-74． ［8］速存梅，叶汉风，袁彦玲，等．育龄妇女孕前保健知识掌握情况及服务利用调查分析 ［J］．中国妇幼保健，2010，25（10）：1376-1378． ［9］张军，高云飞，黄莺莺．孕前保健服务的现状调查及建议 ［J］．护理管理杂志，2012，12（2）：90-91． ［10］徐继红，马旭．育龄妇女孕前心理压力状况及相关因素分析［J］．中国计划生育学杂志，2014，22（8）：508-513．

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-25