[1]杨淑芳,沈冬梅*,朱伟.新产程标准实施后对产程中剖宫产率、剖宫产指征及母婴并发症的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(1):66-69.
　YANG Shu-fang,SHEN Dong-mei*,ZHU Wei.Effects on cesarean section rate, cesarean section indication and maternal and child complications after the implementation of the new labor standard[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(1):66-69.
点击复制

新产程标准实施后对产程中剖宫产率、剖宫产指征及母婴并发症的影响
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年1期
页码:
66-69
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2019-01-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects on cesarean section rate, cesarean section indication and maternal and child complications after the implementation of the new labor standard
作者:
杨淑芳1;  沈冬梅1*; 朱伟2
1.211300江苏南京，高淳人民医院产科；2.210000江苏南京，江苏省人民医院麻醉科
Author(s):
YANG Shu-fang1; SHEN Dong-mei1*; ZHU Wei2
1.Department of Obstetrics,Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital,Nanjing Jiangsu 211300,P.R.China；2.Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing Jiangsu 210000, P.R.China
关键词:
新产程标准; 分娩方式; 剖宫产指征; 母婴并发症
Keywords:
new labor standards; mode of delivery; cesarean section indication; maternal and child complications
分类号:
R 714.3
摘要:
目的探讨新产程标准实施后剖宫产率、剖宫产指征及母婴并发症发生情况。方法回顾性分析2015年南京市高淳人民医院实行传统产程管理分娩的1 100例产妇（对照组）与2016年5月至2017年4月采取新产程标准管理分娩的960例产妇（研究组）的临床资料，比较两组产妇分娩方式、剖宫产率、剖宫产指征及母婴并发症发生情况。结果研究组剖宫产率明显低于对照组（2094 % vs 3791 %，P<005）；阴道分娩产妇中，研究组人工干预率低于对照组（P<005）。研究组产妇潜伏期时间及第一产程时间均长于对照组（P<
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the post-cesarean section rate, cesarean section indications and maternal and child complications after the implementation of the new labor standard. Methods1 100 women who gave birth in Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital in 2015 w

参考文献/References:

［1］曾晓明，郑九生，邹卫．新产程标准处理产程2 632例分析 ［J］．江西医药，2015，50（7）：690-692． ［2］时春艳，李博雅．新产程标准及处理的专家共识 (2014) ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（7）：486． ［3］漆洪波，杨慧霞，段涛．关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准 ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（7）：487-489． ［4］谢幸，苟文丽．妇产科学 ［M］．第8版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：177-209． ［5］SPONG C Y, BERGHELLA V, WENSTROM K D, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop ［J］. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, 120 (5): 1181-1193. ［6］ZHANG Jun, LANDY H J, BRANCH D W, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes ［J］. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010, 116 (6): 1281-1287. ［7］Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, et al.Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery ［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210 (3):179-193. ［8］BOYLE A, REDDY U M, LANDY H J, et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States ［J］. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 122 (1): 33-40. ［9］李艺平，汪东霞，余艳萍．实施新产程标准后首次剖宫产率、指征的变化及母儿预后分析 ［J］．广州医科大学学报，2017，45（2）：86-89． ［10］American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, CAUGHEY A B, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery ［J］. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014, 210 (3): 179-193. ［11］LAUGHON S K, BRANCH D W, BEAVER J, et al. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years ［J］. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012, 206 (5): 1-9. ［12］张为远．促进阴道分娩降低剖宫产率:产科面临的严峻挑战 ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（10）：725-727． ［13］LUMBIGANON P, LAOPAIBOON M, GLMEZOGLU A M, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08 ［J］. The Lancet, 2010, 375 (9713): 490-499. ［14］LI H T, ZHOU Y B, LIU J M. The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis ［J］. International Journal of Obesity (2005), 2013, 37 (7): 893-899. ［15］LEE N, MARTENSSON L B, HOMER C, et al. Impact on caesarean section rates following injections of sterile water (ICARIS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial ［J］. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013, 13 (1): 105. ［16］LOWE N K. The overuse of cesarean delivery ［J］. Journal of Obstetric,Gynecologic,and Neonatal Nursing:JOGNN/NAACOG, 2013, 42 (2): 135-136.

相似文献/References:

[1]粟桂香.脐带绕颈经阴道分娩150例临床回顾分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
　SU Gui-xiang.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(1):0.
[2]胡会铭.胎膜早破169例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2012,(02):0.
　HU Hui-ming.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2012,(1):0.
[3]柳宛璐,吴媛媛,乔福元,等.分娩方式与产后避孕[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2012,(06):0.
　LIU Wan-lu,WU Yuan-yuan,QIAO Fu-yuan* Deptment of Obstetrics and Gynecology,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2012,(1):0.
[4]牛琼华.孕期综合管理对产妇分娩方式及母婴结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(06):0.
　Niu Qiong-hua,Nursing.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(1):0.
[5]王国育.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇孕前体质量指数对分娩方式和新生儿体质量的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.
　WANG Guo-yu,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(1):0.
[6]闫梅,王晓银,温琦,等.不同产科因素对产后妇女盆底功能障碍的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(08):0.
　YAN Mei,WANG Xiao-yin,WEN Qi,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(1):0.
[7]王淑静,邓晓岚,菅莹莹,等.不同分娩方式对盆底功能的影响及电刺激治疗的疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,(01):0.
　WANG Shu-jing,DENG Xiao-lan,JIAN Ying-ying,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2016,(1):0.
[8]刘亚萍,孟海霞*.晚期早产的高危因素及不同分娩方式对新生儿预后影响的研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(3):53.
　LIU Ya-ping,MENG Hai-xia*.Study on the risk factors of late premature delivery and the influences of different modes of delivery on neonatal prognosis[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(1):53.
[9]谢洁玲*,蔡叶萍.宫颈上皮内瘤变宫颈环形电切除术后对育龄妇女生育的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(5):40.
　XIE Jie-ling*,CAI Ye-ping.Effects of LEEP on fertility of childbearing age women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(1):40.
[10]胡鸣,陈韦君*,周静.围产期盆底肌锻炼干预对不同分娩方式下盆底功能障碍性疾病的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(10):55.
　HU Ming,CHEN Wei-jun*,ZHOU Jing.Effects of perinatal pelvic floor muscle exercise intervention on pelvic floor dysfunction under different delivery modes[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(1):55.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
江苏省卫生计生委2016年度面上科研课题（项目编号：H 201604）
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-25