[1]陈君玉*,伍亚玲,何金华.腹腔镜下两种保守手术治疗输卵管妊娠的临床疗效与妊娠结局评价[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(6):71-74.
　CHEN Jun-yu*,WU Ya-ling,HE Jin-hua.Clinical efficacy and pregnancy outcome evaluation of two kinds of conservative operation under laparoscope for tubal pregnancy[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(6):71-74.
点击复制

腹腔镜下两种保守手术治疗输卵管妊娠的临床疗效与妊娠结局评价
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年6期
页码:
71-74
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical efficacy and pregnancy outcome evaluation of two kinds of conservative operation under laparoscope for tubal pregnancy
作者:
陈君玉*; 伍亚玲; 何金华
惠州市第一妇幼保健院妇产科
Author(s):
CHEN Jun-yu*; WU Ya-ling; HE Jin-hua
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology，Huizhou First Maternal and Child Health Hospital，Huizhou Guangdong 516001，P.R.China
关键词:
输卵管妊娠; 腹腔镜; 切开取胚术; 妊娠结局
Keywords:
fallopian pregnancy;  laparoscopy;  incision and embryo extraction;  pregnancy outcome
分类号:
R 714.22
摘要:
目的分析腹腔镜下两种保守手术治疗输卵管妊娠的临床疗效及对再次妊娠结局的影响。方法选取2014年4月至2015年8月惠州市第一妇幼保健院收治的输卵管妊娠患者86例，采用随机数字表法将其分为研究组与对照组，各43例。研究组采取腹腔镜下输卵管切开取胚缝合术，对照组采用腹腔镜下输卵管开窗取胚术。对比两组手术时间、术中出血量及排气时间，第2次月经后输卵管通畅、输卵管瘘及盆腔粘连情况。随访2年，统计宫内妊娠、再次异位妊娠、继发性不孕的发生情况，并比较妊娠结局。结果研究组手术时间长于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜005），两组术中出血量及排气时间差异无统计学意义（P＞005）；术后研究组输卵管通畅率高于对照组，输卵管瘘发生率及盆腔粘连率低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）；研究组术后2年内宫内妊娠率高于对照组，再次异位妊娠率及继发性不孕率低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）；两组再次妊娠的母体及胎儿或新生儿的总不良结局发生率差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论腹腔镜下输卵管切开取胚缝合术创伤小、恢复快，可提高输卵管通畅率和宫内妊娠率，并减少再次异位妊娠及继发性不孕的发生，对再次妊娠结局无明显影响。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the clinical effect of two kinds of conservative operation under laparoscope on tubal pregnancy and the influence on the second pregnancy outcomes. Methods86 patients of tubal pregnancy were selected from April 2014 to August 2015 in Huizhou First Maternal and Child Health Hospital, who were divided into study group and control group by using random digital table method, with 43 cases in each. The study group was treated by laparoscopic oviduct incision and embryo extraction with tubal incision suture, the control group by laparoscopic oviduct opening and embryo extraction. The operation time, amount of bleeding and time of exhaust were compared, as well as the condition of tubal patency, fallopian fistula and pelvic adhesions after second menstruation. After following up for 2 years, the incidences of intrauterine pregnancy, ectopic re-pregnancy and secondary infertility were counted, and the outcomes of intrauterine pregnancy were compared. ResultsThe operation time of the study group was longer than the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<005), without statistically significant difference in the amount of bleeding and the exhaust time (P>005). After operation，the patency rate of the fallopian tube of the study group was higher than the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<005), the incidence rates of fallopian tube fistula and pelvic adhesion lower, with statistically significant differences (P<005). The rate of the intrauterine pregnancy of the study group within 2 years after operation was higher than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P<005), and the rates of the ectopic re-pregnancy and secondary infertility of the study group were lower, with statistically significant differences (P< 005), without statistically significant difference in the total bad outcome rates of pregnant women and fetus or newborns (P> 005). ConclusionLaparoscopic oviduct incision and embryo extraction with tubal incision suture has less injury and quick recovery, and it can improve the rates of fallopian tube patency and intrauterine pregnancy, reduce the occurrences of ectopic re-pregnancy and secondary infertility, without obvious effect on the outcomes of the second pregnancy.

参考文献/References:

［1］杜洁贤，王丽丽，刘影，等．经阴道超声评估不同治疗方法对输卵管妊娠患者卵巢储备功能的影响 ［J］．中华超声影像学杂志，2015，24（2）：136-139． ［2］张春花，许高平，钱敏，等．心理护理对异位妊娠手术患者焦虑及术后并发症的影响 ［J］．中华现代护理杂志，2015，21（13）：1555-1557． ［3］李银广，李婕，李理，等．输卵管壶腹部妊娠腹腔镜下两种输卵管缝合方法对再次妊娠结局的影响 ［J］．新医学，2017，48（9）：652-654． ［4］谢幸，苟文丽．妇产科学 ［M］．第8版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：58-59． ［5］Ayim F, Tapp S, Guha S, et al. Can risk factors, clinical history and symptoms be used to predict risk of ectopic pregnancy in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?［J］. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 48(5): 656-662. ［6］熊维，曹莉莉，蒋路频，等．早期卵巢上皮性癌经腹腔镜与开腹行全面分期手术的临床对比分析 ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2017，52（2）：103-109． ［7］崔芳，徐珊，史红，等．甲氨蝶呤不同给药方法联合腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠［J］．中华医学杂志，2015，95（45）：3663-3666． ［8］Fujishita A, Araki H, Yoshida S, et al. Outcome of conservative laparoscopic surgery for adnexal torsion through one-stage or two-stage operation ［J］. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2015, 41(3): 411-417. ［9］李琳，王金娟，成九梅．腹腔镜下输卵管开窗取胚术后缝合与否的临床对比研究［J］．中华医学杂志，2016，96（30）：2424-2426． ［10］谭宏伟，李小娟，胡春艳，等．经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠的对比研究 ［J］．中国微创外科杂志，2015，15（7）：610-612，615． ［11］Yanaihara A, Ohgi S, Motomura K, et al. An abdominal ectopic pregnancy following a frozen-thawed ART cycle: a case report and review of the literature［J］. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017, 17(1): 108. ［12］单江静，郑媛媛，卢琪芸，等．腹腔镜子宫内膜异位症卵巢囊肿剥除术中不同止血方法对卵巢功能影响 ［J］．中华内分泌外科杂志，2016，10 （2）：170-173． ［13］赵蓉，王丽梅，魏特曼，等．腹腔镜卵巢成熟畸胎瘤剥除术中不同止血方法对卵巢储备功能的影响［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2017，52（1）：57-60． ［14］蒋倩颖，杨起楠，黄倩倩，等．腹腔镜下输卵管壶腹部妊娠切开取胚术两种止血方法的比较 ［J］．广东医学，2016，37（S1）：99-101． ［15］许秀霞，方丹妹，范馥芳．腹腔镜下输卵管妊娠切开取胚术创面缝合与不缝合的术后近、远期疗效［J］．中国妇幼保健，2016，31（23）：5168-5170． ［16］邓佑兴，文璞，邵雪，等．腹腔镜下输卵管妊娠开窗取胚术后缝合对卵巢储备功能的影响［J］．山东医药，2017，57（21）：82-84． ［17］孙莉，梁磊．腹腔镜输卵管妊娠保守术后持续性异位妊娠危险因素分析 ［J］．河北医药，2016，38（7）：1041-1043．

相似文献/References:

[1]喻海芬,熊毅刚.腹腔镜诊治计划生育手术并发症32例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
[2]张榑,马葆荣,薛润清,等.子宫肌瘤切除三种术式临床效果比较[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(02):0.
　ZHANG Fu,MA Bao-rong,XUE Run-qing.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(6):0.
[3]刘彩艳.宫角妊娠34例诊治分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[4]吕建利,郑红艳.腹腔镜治疗卵巢成熟性囊性畸胎瘤42例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[5]宋治兰,贺进,钱碧慧,等.腹腔镜辅助盆底重建术治疗子宫脱垂的临床疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(05):0.
　SONG Zhi-lan,HE Jin,QIAN Bi-hui.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(6):0.
[6]蒋芝蓉,罗光楠.腹腔镜下腹膜阴道成形术342例报道[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　JIANG Zhi-rong,LUO Guang-nan.Chengdu Sunshine Gynecology Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 00,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(6):0.
[7]刘莉.腹腔镜下不同术式子宫肌瘤切除术51例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　LIU Li.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(6):0.
[8]马建婷,杨春林,苏雪锋,等.腹腔镜子宫内膜异位囊肿剔除术两种止血方法对年轻患者卵巢储备功能的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
　MA Jian-ting,YANG Chun-lin,SU Xue-feng,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(6):0.
[9]黄文华.腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
[10]林永红,李万珍,刘莉,等.悬吊式无气腹腹腔镜巨大子宫肌瘤切除术的初步观察及文献复习[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　LIN Yong-hong,LI Wan-zhen,LIU Li,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(6):0.
[11]蔡叶萍,赵海燕,何伟璇,等.腹腔镜输卵管妊娠保守手术改良方案的临床研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(06):0.
　CAI Ye-Ping,ZHAO Hai-Yan,HE Wei-Xuan,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(6):0.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
惠州市科技计划项目（项目编号：20160804）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-25