[1]高爽,甘雪梅,郭建新*.达芬奇机器人辅助下行宫颈癌根治术治疗4例宫颈鳞癌的应用体会[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(11):32-34,39.
　GAO Shuang,GAN Xue-mei,GUO Jian-xin*.Application of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of cervical cancer in 4 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(11):32-34,39.
点击复制

达芬奇机器人辅助下行宫颈癌根治术治疗4例宫颈鳞癌的应用体会
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
32-34,39
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of cervical cancer in 4 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma
作者:
高爽; 甘雪梅; 郭建新*
中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第三附属医院（野战外科研究所）妇产科
Author(s):
GAO Shuang;  GAN Xue-mei;  GUO Jian-xin*
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042,P.R.China
关键词:
达芬奇机器人手术; 腹腔镜; 宫颈癌根治术
Keywords:
Da Vinci robotic surgery;  laparoscopy;  radical operation for cervical cancer
分类号:
R 713.4
摘要:
目的探讨达芬奇机器人辅助下行宫颈癌根治术治疗4例子宫颈鳞癌的应用价值及体会。方法选择2016年11月至2017年4月在中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第三附属医院（野战外科研究所）应用达芬奇机器人手术系统行宫颈癌根治术的4例患者作为研究对象，观察患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、住院时间、胃肠功能平均恢复时间，是否伴有盆、腹腔脏器损伤，标本残端肿瘤细胞残留，术后感染，出血等短期并发症。结果4例达芬奇机器人辅助下行宫颈癌根治术均成功完成，无中转开腹，且术中、术后均未发现盆、腹腔脏器受损，标本残端未发现肿瘤细胞残留；平均手术时间(30048±4932) min，术中平均出血量(14536±3219) mL，平均清扫淋巴结(2242±209)枚，术后胃肠功能平均恢复时间(234±071) d，平均住院时间(1047±121) d；术后未见感染、出血等短期并发症。结论达芬奇机器人辅助应用于宫颈癌根治术，安全、可行，创伤较小，具有临床应用价值。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the value and experience of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of cervical cancer in the treatment of 4 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. MethodsFrom November 2016 to April 2017, 4 cases of radical resection of cervical cancer were operated by Da Vinci robotic surgical system in Third Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University. The operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the number of lymph node dissection, the time of hospitalization and the recovery time of the gastrointestinal function were observed, and the short-term complications such as pelvic and abdominal viscera injury, residual tumor cells in the specimen, postoperative infection and bleeding were observed. Results4 cases of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of cervical cancer were completed successfully, without conversion to laparotomy. No pelvic and abdominal organs were damaged during and after operation. The residual tumor cells were not found. The mean operation time was (300.48 ± 49.32) min, the average bleeding volume was (145.36 ± 32.19) mL, and the average clearance of lymph nodes was (22.42 ± 2.09), postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time was (2.34 ± 0.71) d, average length of stay was (14.47 ± 1.21) d; no postoperative infection, bleeding and other short-term complications. ConclusionDa Vinci robot assisted radical resection of cervical cancer is safe and feasible with less trauma， and has clinical application value.

参考文献/References:

［1］乔友林，赵宇倩．宫颈癌的流行病学现状和预防 ［J］．中华妇幼临床医学杂志（电子版），2015，11 （2）：1-6． ［2］向江东，李林霞，周莉娜．腹腔镜与开腹手术在宫颈癌治疗中的对比研究 ［J］．现代肿瘤医学，2016，24 （22）：3615-3618． ［3］贺红英，阳志军，卢迎新，等．妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜手术学习曲线的研究进展 ［J］．国际妇产科学杂志，2016，43 （1）：58-62． ［4］苏日力格，刘旭，徐哲，等．机器人手术在关节外科中的应用进展 ［J］．转化医学电子杂志，2017，4 （12）：77-80． ［5］马芮，马佳佳，宋晖，等．机器人手术系统在妇科恶性肿瘤中的应用 ［J］．现代肿瘤医学，2017，25 （10）：1670-1673． ［6］叶惠荣，范良生，邓志校，等．宫颈癌腹腔镜手术疗效及影响预后的相关因素分析 ［J］．中国妇幼保健，2015，30 （21）：3710-3713． ［7］胡玲，姜玲，胡姣，等．宫颈癌腹腔镜下保留神经平面广泛子宫切除术的疗效观察 ［J］．实用癌症杂志，2015，30（8）：1240-1242． ［8］API M, BOZA A, CEYHAN M. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: case report and review of literature ［J］. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23 (5): 677-683. ［9］徐福霞．在妇科领域应用腹腔镜技术的进展 ［J］．医疗装备，2017，30（16）：196-197． ［10］ZHOU Jing, XIONG Bing-hong, MA Li, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis ［J］. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2016, 12 (1): 145-154. ［11］JOHANSEN G, LONNERFORS C, FALCONER H, et al. Reproductive and oncologic outcome following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer ［J］. Gynecologic Oncology, 2016, 141 (1, SI): 160-165. ［12］刘金钰，张锌，高春英，等.达芬奇机器人系统在宫颈癌根治术中的应用（附40例报告）［J］.中华腔镜外科杂志（电子版），2017，10（2）：93-96. ［13］BAFFERT S, ALRAN S, FOURCHOTTE V, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy after concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer compared to laparotomy: A multi institutional prospective pilot study of cost, surgical outcome and quality of life ［J］. EJSO, 2016, 42 (3): 391-399. ［14］NGAN T,CZUZOJ-SHULMAN N,ZAKHARI A,et al.Laparoscopic and robotically-assisted hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas:a comparison of costs and complications ［J］. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016, 23 (7): S72-S74. ［15］CAI J,YANG L,DONG W,et al.Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer ［J］.International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 132 (1): 29-33. ［16］杨丽，马彩玲，叶远征，等．腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术治疗早期宫颈癌的Meta分析 ［J］．现代妇产科进展，2014，12（12）：983-986． ［17］孙琴花，易蓉，杨丹．腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术的近期疗效及患者预后的影响因素分析［J］．癌症进展，2016，14（5）：497-499． ［18］XIAO Mei-zhu,GAO Hui-qiao,BAI Hui-min,et al.Quality of life and sexuality in disease-free survivors of cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy alone: A comparison between total laparoscopy and laparotomy ［J］.Medicine, 2016, 95 (36): e4787. ［19］KRUIJDENBERG C B,LC V E,HENDRIKS J C,et al.Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer,a review ［J］.Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 120 (3): 334-339. ［20］夏欢，曹莉莉，蒋璐频，等．腹腔镜下保留盆腔自主神经的广泛性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的安全性及疗效的临床研究 ［J］．实用妇产科杂志，2016，32（10）：763-766．

相似文献/References:

[1]喻海芬,熊毅刚.腹腔镜诊治计划生育手术并发症32例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
[2]张榑,马葆荣,薛润清,等.子宫肌瘤切除三种术式临床效果比较[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(02):0.
　ZHANG Fu,MA Bao-rong,XUE Run-qing.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(11):0.
[3]刘彩艳.宫角妊娠34例诊治分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[4]吕建利,郑红艳.腹腔镜治疗卵巢成熟性囊性畸胎瘤42例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[5]宋治兰,贺进,钱碧慧,等.腹腔镜辅助盆底重建术治疗子宫脱垂的临床疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(05):0.
　SONG Zhi-lan,HE Jin,QIAN Bi-hui.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(11):0.
[6]蒋芝蓉,罗光楠.腹腔镜下腹膜阴道成形术342例报道[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　JIANG Zhi-rong,LUO Guang-nan.Chengdu Sunshine Gynecology Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 00,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(11):0.
[7]刘莉.腹腔镜下不同术式子宫肌瘤切除术51例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　LIU Li.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(11):0.
[8]马建婷,杨春林,苏雪锋,等.腹腔镜子宫内膜异位囊肿剔除术两种止血方法对年轻患者卵巢储备功能的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
　MA Jian-ting,YANG Chun-lin,SU Xue-feng,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(11):0.
[9]黄文华.腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
[10]林永红,李万珍,刘莉,等.悬吊式无气腹腹腔镜巨大子宫肌瘤切除术的初步观察及文献复习[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　LIN Yong-hong,LI Wan-zhen,LIU Li,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(11):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-25