[1]朵雪莲*,马梅艳,白盖措.盆腔淋巴结切除数目对不同治疗方案的宫颈癌患者无进展生存时间的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(9):47-52.
 DUO Xue-lian*,MA Mei-yan,BAI Gai-cuo.Effect of number of pelvic lymph node resection on progression-free survival of cervical cancer patients with different treatment regimens[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(9):47-52.
点击复制

盆腔淋巴结切除数目对不同治疗方案的宫颈癌患者无进展生存时间的影响
分享到:

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年9期
页码:
47-52
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2019-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of number of pelvic lymph node resection on progression-free survival of cervical cancer patients with different treatment regimens
作者:
朵雪莲*马梅艳白盖措
青海省妇幼保健院妇产科
Author(s):
DUO Xue-lian*MA Mei-yanBAI Gai-cuo
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qinghai Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Xining Qinghai 810000,P.R.China
关键词:
宫颈肿瘤进展生存时间新辅助化疗
Keywords:
cervical neoplasmsprogressive survival timeneoadjuvant chemotherapy
分类号:
R 737.33
摘要:
目的探讨盆腔淋巴结切除数目对不同治疗方案的宫颈癌患者无进展生存时间(progression-free-survival,PFS)的影响。方法收集2009年1月至2016年1月青海省妇幼保健院收治的725例宫颈癌患者的病例资料,根据术前是否接受新辅助化疗,将患者分为直接手术(primary surgical treatment,PST)组及新辅助化疗后再手术(neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery,NCS)组,比较不同淋巴结切除数目对患者预后的影响。结果① 341例(470 %)患者接受了术后补充治疗。NCS组患者的高危因素明显多于PST组(P<005),但中危因素差异无统计学意义(P>005)。② PST组、NCS组分别平均有(023±017)枚、(026±021)枚淋巴结存在转移,术中分别平均切除(248±942)枚、(259±964)枚淋巴结。两组患者的淋巴结转移数目、切除数目相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>005)。③ 生存分析显示,在NCS组中,淋巴结转移数量≥2的患者预后较差(P<005)。但在PST组中,淋巴结转移数量对患者预后无明显影响(P>005)。④ 在NCS组中,与淋巴结切除数目<19枚的患者相比,切除数目≥19枚的患者预后明显较好(P<005)。但在PST组中,增加淋巴结切除数量并未使患者生存获益(P<005)。⑤ 对PST组中淋巴结转移数量≥2枚的患者而言,增加淋巴结切除数量仍未使患者获得明显的生存收益(P>005)。但在NCS组中,淋巴结切除数量≥19枚的患者预后显著好于切除数量<19枚的患者(P<005),这种生存获益的趋势比淋巴结切除数量对NCS组总体生存率的影响更为显著。⑥ 多因素分析显示,仅有淋巴结转移、切缘情况是影响NCS组患者预后的独立性危险因素(P<005)。结论对接受新辅助化疗的早期宫颈癌患者,增加淋巴结切除数量可有更好的生存获益。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the number of pelvic lymph node resection on progression-free survival(PFS) in cervical cancer patients with different treatment regimens. MethodsThe clinical data of 725 patients with cervical cancer admitted to Qing

参考文献/References:

[1]程海荣,陈杰.年轻早期宫颈癌患者的诊治进展 [J].现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(4):678-680. [2]KSE M F, KISELI M, KIMYON G, et al. Extraperitoneal lymph node dissection in locally advanced cervical cancer:the prognostic factors associated with survival [J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2017, 18(2): 77-84. [3]HAN Xiaotian, WEN Hao, JU Xingzhu, et al. Predictive factors of para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis in cervical cancer patients: a retrospective analysis based on 723 para-aortic lymphadenectomy cases [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(31): 51840-51847. [4]SHANG Chun-liang, ZHU Wen-hui, LIU Tian-yu, et al. Characterization of long non-coding RNA expression profiles in lymph node metastasis of early-stage cervical cancer [J]. Oncology Reports, 2016, 35(6): 3185-3197. [5]于岩岩,董越,罗娅红.DWI评估早期宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移的临床应用进展 [J].现代肿瘤医学,2017,25(19):3170-3173. [6]YU F, TODO Y, YAMAZAKI H, et al. Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited [J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23(1): 126-133. [7]朱静芳.老年宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜下广泛子宫切除联合盆腔淋巴结清扫术的临床效果观察 [J].实用癌症杂志,2016,31(11):1822-1824. [8]于岩岩,董越,董瑞彤,等.ⅠB1~ⅡA1期宫颈鳞癌盆腔淋巴结转移的相关因素分析及30 T MR-DWI的预测价值 [J].放射学实践,2017,32(4):325-327. [9]SUPRASERT P, CHAROENKWAN K, KHUNAMORNPONG S. Pelvic node removal and disease-free survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy [J]. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2012, 116(1): 43-46. [10]SOLIMAN P T, FRUMOVITZ M, SUN C C, et al. Radical hysterectomy: A comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2011, 123(2): 333-336. [11]MARITA A, ORDEANU C, RANCEA A, et al. Long-term survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer:results of the Oncology Institute"Prof.Dr.Ion Chiricuta"experience [J]. Journal of Medicine&Life, 2018, 11(1): 42-50. [12]BOGANI G, DITTO A, MARTINELLI F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-related leukopoenia as a biomarkers predicting survival outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 44(4): 549-550.

相似文献/References:

[1]伍军平,罗新,王晓玉,等.宫颈组织hTERC基因检测在宫颈癌筛查中的意义[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(04):0.
 WU Jun-ping,LUO Xin,WANG Xiao-yu,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(9):0.
[2]陈云飞,王朝霞,李莉,等.顺铂对宫颈癌裸鼠移植瘤模型淋巴转移的影响及作用机制[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(06):0.
 CHEN Yun-fei,WANG Zhao-xia,LI Li,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(9):0.
[3]刘国强,张朝红,谢映君,等.高危型人乳头瘤病毒联合液基细胞学检测在宫颈癌前病变筛查中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(06):0.
 LIU Guo-qiang,ZHANG Zhao-hong,XIE Ying-jun,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(9):0.
[4]赵佳,何玉霞,杜利君*.四川南充地区3 762例女性高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染结果分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(8):94.
 ZHAO jia,HE Yu-xia,DU Li-jun*.Analysis of 3 762 women with high-risk HPV infection in Nanchong area, Sichuan[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(9):94.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-25