[1]何秀宣*,李标,程燕.剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室对再生育的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(5):25-28.
　HE Xiu-xuan*,LI Biao,CHENG Yan.Effect of scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section on reproduction[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(5):25-28.
点击复制

剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室对再生育的影响
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年5期
页码:
25-28
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2019-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section on reproduction
作者:
何秀宣*; 李标; 程燕
广元市中医医院妇产科
Author(s):
HE Xiu-xuan*; LI Biao; CHENG Yan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangyuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangyuan Sichuan 628000，P.R.China
关键词:
瘢痕子宫; 子宫瘢痕憩室; 再妊娠; 子宫下段异常
Keywords:
cicatricial uterus;  uterine scar diverticulum;  repregnancy;  abnormal uterine segment
分类号:
R 714.2
摘要:
目的 分析剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室对再生育的影响。方法选取2015年2月至2018年2月广元市中医医院分娩的82例剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室孕妇为研究对象（研究组），同期分娩的剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫孕妇64例为对照组，记录孕妇末次超声子宫下段肌层厚度、Apgar评分、新生儿窒息、孕周、产后大出血、剖宫产情况等指标，分析子宫下段异常因素。结果研究组孕妇再次剖宫产80例，经阴道成功生产2例，再次剖宫产率9756 %，对照组孕妇再次剖宫产62例，经阴道成功生产2例，再次剖宫产率9688 %（P＞005）；研究组孕妇末次超声子宫下段肌层厚度和妊娠天数均小于对照组孕妇，子宫下段异常率高于对照组孕妇，差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）；急诊手术率、新生儿窒息率、产后大出血率比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞005）；研究组孕妇孕周＞37周、34～36+6周、＜34周再次剖宫产率分别为8625 %、875 %、375 %，对照组孕妇相同孕周再次剖宫产率为6774 %、2258 %、968 %，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；大憩室组和小憩室组孕妇手术中子宫下段异常率分别为3333 %、1951 %，均高于对照组孕妇（1290 %）（P＜005）；憩室类型和子宫下段肌层厚度为子宫下段异常的危险因素。结论剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫合并子宫瘢痕憩室患者较单纯的瘢痕子宫患者再妊娠时子宫下段异常发生率高，妊娠时间短，再次剖宫产率高。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo discuss effect of scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum on production after cesarean section. MethodsA total of 82 pregnant women with scar uterus combined with uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section from February 2015 to February 2018 in Guangyuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as study subjects (study group)，64 cases of cicatricial uterus after cesarean section in the same period were selected as the control group. The thickness of the last ultrasound of the lower uterine segment of the uterus, Apgar score, neonatal asphyxia, gestational age, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section and other indicators were recorded to analyze the abnormal factors of the lower uterus.ResultsThere were 80 cases of cesarean section in the study group, 2 cases of successful vaginal production, 9756 % of cesarean section again. 62 cases of cesarean section in the control group, 2 cases of successful vaginal production and 9688 % of cesarean section（P＞005）. The thickness of subuterine segment and the number of pregnancy days in the study group were less than those of the control group, the abnormal rate of subuterine segment was higher than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<005).There was no significant difference in emergency operation rate, neonatal asphyxia rate and postpartum hemorrhage rate (P>005). The resection rate of pregnant women after 37 weeks, 34~36+6 weeks and less than 34 weeks in the study group was 8625 %, 875 % and 375 %, respectively. The difference was statistically significant compared with the rate of 6774 %, 2258 % and 968 % of the control group at same gestational weeks (P<005).The abnormal rate of subuterine segment in the large diverticulum group and the small diverticulum group was 3333 % and 1951 %, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group (1290 %) (P<005). The diverticulum type and the thickness of the lower uterine muscle layer were risk factors for abnormalities in the lower uterus. ConclusionAfter cesarean section, the patients with scar uterus combined with uterine cicatricial diverticulum have higher incidence of abnormal subuterine segment, shorter pregnancy time and high rate of cesarean section than those with simple scar uterus.

参考文献/References:

［1］POMORSKI M，FUCHS T，ROSNER-TENEROWICZ A A. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section ［J］. Ginekologia Polska，2017，88 (4): 174-179. ［2］李莉，颜建英．瘢痕子宫再次妊娠致子宫破裂危险因素的临床研究 ［J］．现代妇产科进展，2014，23（2）：158-160． ［3］SAVARINO V，PACE F，SCARPIGNATO C，et al. Randomised clinical trial: mucosal protection combined with acid suppression in the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease - efficacy of Esoxx，a hyaluronic acid-chondroitin sulphate based bioadhesive formulation ［J］. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics，2017，45 (5): 631-642. ［4］张宁宁，王光伟，杨清．剖宫产子宫瘢痕憩室52例的临床诊治分析 ［J］．生殖医学杂志，2017，26（4）：331-335． ［5］沈柯炜，张英芝，周欢珍，等．二次剖宫产行子宫瘢痕切除术预防剖宫产切口瘢痕憩室效果的临床研究 ［J］．实用妇产科杂志，2017，33（10）：782-785． ［6］中华医学会儿科学分会．新生儿疾病诊疗规范 ［M］．北京：人民卫生出版社，2016：201-205． ［7］曹泽毅．中华妇产科学 ［M］．第3版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2014：147-153． ［8］曹晓明，黄庆，史玉爽，等．不同剖宫产缝合方式对子宫切口瘢痕憩室形成的影响 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2017，9（3）：31-33． ［9］张宁宁，王光伟，杨清．腹腔镜下不同方法修复剖宫产子宫瘢痕憩室的临床疗效分析 ［J］．中国医科大学学报，2017，46（9）：853-856． ［10］LI Y，GONG L，WU X，et al. Randomized controlled trial of hysteroscopy or ultrasonography versus no guidance during D&C after uterine artery chemoembolization for cesarean scar pregnancy ［J］. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics，2016，135 (2): 158-162. ［11］张连民，占建丽，赵旭．妇科微创手术在剖宫产子宫切口瘢痕憩室治疗中的疗效分析 ［J］．腹腔镜外科杂志，2017，22（6）：456-459． ［12］STURZENEGGER K，SCHAFFER L，ZIMMERMANN R A. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure ［J］. Journal of Perinatal Medicine，2017，45 (3): 309-313. ［13］王细拉．经宫腹腔镜联合手术切除治疗剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕憩室的疗效 ［J］．中国妇幼保健，2017，32（17）：4277-4279． ［14］D'AMICO V L，CORIA N，GABRIELA PALACIOS M A，et al. Physiological differences between two overlapped breeding Antarctic penguins in a global change perspective ［J］. Polar Biology，2016，39 (1，SI): 57-64. ［15］赵国华，张爱兰，徐加英，等．再次剖宫产“个体化缝合法”对子宫切口瘢痕缺陷形成的预防研究 ［J］．中国生育健康杂志，2017，28（4）：364-366． ［16］ZHOU Jie-ru，YAO Min，WANG Hu-sheng，et al. Vaginal repair of cesarean section scar diverticula that resulted in improved postoperative menstruation ［J］. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology，2016，23 (6): 969-978. ［17］王艺桦，马琳，阚艳敏，等．经阴道超声观察剖宫产术后瘢痕憩室的结构特点及其危险因素分析 ［J］．中国医科大学学报，2016，45（2）：158-161． ［18］LI Yang，WANG Wei-wen，YANG Ting，et al. Incorporating uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy following diagnostic ultrasonography ［J］. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics，2016，134 (2): 202-207. ［19］冯晓冰，陈建国．宫腔镜电切及经阴道子宫瘢痕憩室切除缝合术治疗子宫瘢痕憩室的效果比较 ［J］．广西医科大学学报，2016，33（3）：521-523． ［20］ZHANG Ying. A comparative study of transvaginal repair and laparoscopic repair in the management of patients with previous cesarean scar defect ［J］. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology，2016，23 (4): 535-541. ［21］张淙越，尹玲，肖冰冰，等．腹腔镜下剖宫产瘢痕憩室修补术后妊娠的产科结局——病例报道并文献复习 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2016，8（9）：72-75，78．

相似文献/References:

[1]唐国梅.米索前列醇联合依沙吖啶终止瘢痕子宫中期妊娠的临床观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(02):0.
[2]王星.一次性宫腔组织吸引管用于瘢痕子宫人工流产术临床观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
　WANG Xing Family Planning Service Station of Fuyang city,Fuyang Anhui 000,P.R.China.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(5):0.
[3]邹敏,刘正飞.492例瘢痕子宫妊娠分娩结局临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(05):0.
　ZOU Min,LIU Zheng-fei.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(5):0.
[4]闫少甫.瘢痕子宫妊娠重复剖宫产并发症的对比分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(03):0.
　YAN Shao - fu.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(5):0.
[5]李海英,刘小瑜.瘢痕子宫妊娠经阴道分娩113例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(06):0.
　LI Hai-ying,LIU Xiao-yu,Obstetrics.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(5):0.
[6]王秀芝.曲马多配伍安定在瘢痕子宫妊娠引产中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(06):0.
　Wang Xiu-zhi,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(5):0.
[7]徐焕,李笑天.瘢痕子宫再生育风险的对策[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.
[8]呼松月.河南扶沟县2007~2013年剖宫产率及剖宫产指征变化原因分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(08):0.
　HU Song-yue,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(5):0.
[9]张丽娟.剖宫产术后再次妊娠经阴道分娩的临床观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(03):0.
　Zhang Li-juan,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(5):0.
[10]林鑫子,黄晨玲子,罗新,等.剖宫产再次分娩子宫破裂相关危险因素的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,(07):0.
　LIN Xin-zi,HUANG Chen-lingzi,LUO Xin,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2016,(5):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-25