[1]蒋雪玲*,来晓莉,薛焕清.二胎高龄孕妇心理状态评分对内心期望分娩方式的影响及其临床意义[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(4):73-75,83.
　JIANG Xue ling*,LAI Xiao li,XUE Huan qing.Effect of psychological status score of secondborn pregnant women on inner expectation of delivery and its clinical significance[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(4):73-75,83.
点击复制

二胎高龄孕妇心理状态评分对内心期望分娩方式的影响及其临床意义
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
73-75,83
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of psychological status score of secondborn pregnant women on inner expectation of delivery and its clinical significance
作者:
蒋雪玲*; 来晓莉; 薛焕清
广西壮族自治区人民医院产科
Author(s):
JIANG Xueling*; LAI Xiaoli; XUE Huanqing
Department of Obstetrics,the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning Guangxi 530021，P.R.China
关键词:
二胎; 高龄孕妇; 心理状态; 分娩方式
Keywords:
second child; elderly maternal; mental state; mode of delivery
分类号:
R 7153
摘要:
目的 探讨二胎高龄孕妇心理状态评分与其内心期望分娩方式的关系，分析内心期望分娩方式与实际分娩方式之间的异同对妊娠结局的影响。方法 选取2017年1月至2018年6月在广西壮族自治区人民医院进行常规产检的312例二胎高龄孕妇为研究对象,收集一般资料与内心期望的分娩方式，采用焦虑自评量表（SelfRating Anxiety Scale，SAS）与抑郁自评量表（SelfRating Depression Scale，SDS）对患者心理状态进行评分，观察不同孕期孕妇心理状态、其内心期望的分娩方式以及分娩结局。结果 孕晚期阶段，期望进行阴道生产的孕妇 SAS、SDS 评分均明显低于期望进行剖宫产的孕妇（P＜005），心理状态不佳孕妇中期望进行剖宫产所占的比例明显高于心理状态良好者期望进行剖宫产的比例（P＜005）。孕晚期期望分娩方式与最终分娩方式不一致的产妇产后抑郁与产后出血发生率显著高于一致组产妇，且新生儿Apgar评分也低于一致组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）。结论 二胎高龄孕妇的心理状态会影响孕妇内心的期望分娩方式，当实际分娩方式与预期分娩方式不一致时，会进一步增加孕产妇的负性情绪程度，从而影响妊娠结局，临床需引起重视，必要时给予相应的干预措施。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between the psychological status score of the secondborn elderly women and their inner expectation of delivery, and analyze the impact of the similarities and differences between the inner expectation and actual delivery on pregnancy outcomes.Methods From January 2017 to June 2018, 312 pregnant women with second trimester pregnancy who underwent routine checkups in the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected as the research subjects. General data and inner expectation of delivery were collected. Selfrating anxiety scale (SAS) and Selfrating depression scale (SDS) were used to score the psychological state of the patients, and to observe the psychological state of pregnant women at different stages of pregnancy, their inner childbirth expectation and delivery outcomes. Results In the third trimester, the SAS and SDS scores of pregnant women expecting vaginal delivery were significantly lower than those expecting cesarean delivery (P<0.05). The proportion of expectant cesarean delivery among pregnant women with poor mental status was obvious. It was higher than the proportion of those who were in good psychological state expecting cesarean section(P<0.05). The incidence of postpartum depression and postpartum hemorrhage in the second trimester of expectation and the final delivery were significantly higher than those in the same group, and the Apgar score of the newborn was lower than that in the same group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The psychological state of the second trimester of pregnancy can affect the expectant delivery mode of the pregnant woman. When the actual delivery mode is not consistent with the expected delivery mode, it will further increase the negative emotional level of the pregnant woman, which will affect the pregnancy outcome. Appropriate intervention measures should be given from time to time.

参考文献/References:

［1］杨传华，赵方芳．高龄产妇分娩结局与分娩方式选择的相关性研究 ［J］．中国妇幼保健，2013，28（1）：4950． ［2］刘梅．剖宫产高危妊娠产妇术前焦虑、抑郁状况及影响因素分析 ［J］．齐齐哈尔医学院学报，2019，40（8）：10341036． ［3］杨澜帆．高龄妇女再生育的内科风险 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2014，6（7）：16． ［4］Almeida E C, Nogueira A A, Candido Dos Reis F J, et al.Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain ［J］.International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2002, 79 （2）: 101104. ［5］张婉婉，仇春波．孕期睡眠质量与焦虑、抑郁心理的相关性调查研究 ［J］．中国现代医生，2016，54（10）：5052． ［6］陈莉，漆洪波．英国皇家妇产科医师协会“产后出血指南（2016版）”要点解读 ［J］．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2017，33（11）：11581163． ［7］余彦亮，张谦慎，杨传忠，等．影响1min Apgar评分0～1分新生儿的围产期因素及复苏后结局分析 ［J］．中国新生儿科杂志，2015，30（5）：331334． ［8］吴孝苹，段占祺，杨青梅，等．“二孩政策”后四川省经产妇人口学特点和高龄产妇妊娠与分娩期疾病分布 ［J］．中国计划生育和妇产科，2019，11（7）：9094． ［9］何琳，韩爱英，赵艳桃．二胎高龄产妇的心理分析与心理护理探讨 ［J］．实用临床护理学电子杂志，2018，3（23）：96． ［10］Giardinelli L, Innocenti A, Benni L, et al.Depression and anxiety in perinatal period: prevalence and risk factors in an Italian sample ［J］.Archives of Womens Mental Health, 2012, 15 （1）: 2130. ［11］吴波，刘静，常隽，等．二胎剖宫产待产妇妊娠特有焦虑状况调查分析 ［J］．护理学杂志，2019，34（19）：7678． ［12］朱新丽，顾春怡，陶花，等．生育政策调整初期正常初产孕妇预期分娩方式及相关因素分析 ［J］．中华护理杂志，2016,51（9）：10441048． ［13］宋亚琴，徐惠英，冯桂兰．产前护理干预对于高危妊娠初产妇分娩结局的影响 ［J］．护士进修杂志，2017，32（3）：248251． ［14］郑建盛，连雪冰，杨丽全，等．家庭因素对高龄二胎妊娠期妇女睡眠质量的影响 ［J］．实用医学杂志，2017，33（21）：36503654． ［15］吴结英，何艳君．分娩预演健康教育对孕妇焦虑及分娩方式的影响 ［J］．护理学报，2013，20（22）：7678． ［16］赵立娟，韩辉，王彦华，等．导乐陪伴分娩对产妇心理因素的影响研究 ［J］．河北医药，2017，39（16）：25502552． ［17］Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, et al.A systematic review and metaanalysis of the effects of antenatal anxiety on postpartum outcomes ［J］.Archives of Womens Mental Health, 2019, 22 （5）: 543556

相似文献/References:

[1]杨澜帆.高龄妇女再生育的内科风险[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.
[2]牛建民.高龄妇女再生育的产时及产后风险[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.
[3]范建霞,黄荷凤.高龄妇女再生育子代健康风险[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(07):0.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题（项目编号：Z 20191088）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-25