[1]袁宏伟,俞立丰,袁青晨,等.腹针分期治疗原发性痛经临床观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(6):48-50,59.
　YUAN Hongwei,YU Lifeng,YUAN Qingchen,et al.Clinical observation of abdominal acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhea by stages[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(6):48-50,59.
点击复制

腹针分期治疗原发性痛经临床观察
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年6期
页码:
48-50,59
栏目:
中医在妇产科的应用专栏
出版日期:
2020-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical observation of abdominal acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhea by stages
作者:
袁宏伟1; 俞立丰2; 袁青晨2; 张云舒2; 李欣蔚2; 刘云霞1*
1.100700北京，北京中医药大学东直门医院针灸科；2.100038北京，北京中医药大学
Author(s):
YUAN Hongwei1; YU Lifeng2; YUAN Qingchen2; ZHANG Yunshu2; LI Xinwei2; LIU Yunxia1*
1. Department of Accupuncture,Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, P.R.China;2. Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine， Beijing 100038, P.R.China
关键词:
腹针; 体针; 原发性痛经; 分期治疗
Keywords:
abdominal acupuncture;  primary dysmenorrhea;  staged treatment
分类号:
R 271113
摘要:
目的观察腹针与体针两种方式分期治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效差异。方法选取2017年6月至2018年11月北京中医药大学东直门医院40例原发性痛经患者，按照随机数字表法分为腹针组和体针组，每组20例。两组均根据女性生理特点进行周期疗法，依月经期、经后期、经间期、经前期分期而治。两组分别自月经周期的第1天开始治疗，每期治疗2次，每次留针30 min，治疗16次为1个疗程，比较两组治疗效果。结果腹针组与体针组治疗短期均有效。且随着治疗次数的增加，腹针组疗效优于体针组，差异有统计学意义（P<005）。治疗后随访3月，两组治疗总有效率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞005），但腹针组总显效率优于体针组（40 % vs 10 %，P<005）。结论腹针治疗原发性痛经有较好的疗效，值得临床推广。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo observe the difference of clinical effect between abdominal acupuncture and body acupuncture in treating primary dysmenorrhea by stages.Methods40 patients with primary dysmenorrhea in Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2017 to November 2018 were randomly divided into abdominal acupuncture group and body acupuncture group, 20 cases in each group. Both groups were treated according to the physiological characteristics of women, menstrual period, menstrual period, menstrual period and prophase. The two groups were treated from the first day of the menstrual cycle, 2 times per period, 30 minutes each time, 16 times as a course of treatment，compared treatment effects between the two groups.ResultsBoth abdominal acupuncture group and body acupuncture group were effective in short term. With the increase of treatment times, the effect of abdominal acupuncture group was better than that of body acupuncture group，the difference was statistically significant (P<005). Followed-up for 3 months after treatment, there was no significant difference in the total effective rate of treatment between the two groups (P>005)，but the total apparent efficiency rate of abdominal acupuncture group was better than that of body acupuncture group (40 % vs 10 %,P<005).ConclusionAbdominal acupuncture has a good effect on primary dysmenorrhea, which is worth clinical promotion.

参考文献/References:

［1］谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学［M］.第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014:362363. ［2］张兰.重点高中女生痛经情况调查及健康教育干预结果分析［J］.中国校医, 2013, 27(5): 373, 375. ［3］王博,王明闯,王忠民.女大学生痛经心理因素及其预防方法研究 ［J］.科教导刊(下旬), 2015(6): 174175,177. ［4］Balik G,Ustüner I,Kaqitci M, et al. Is there a relationship between mood disorders and dysmenorrhea ［J］. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2014, 27( 6): 371374. ［5］Habibi N,Huang M S, Gan W Y, et al. Prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea and factors associated with its intensity among undergraduate students: a crosssectional study ［J］. Pain Manag Nurs, 2015, 16(6): 855861. ［6］Gul E,Celik Kavak E.Eotaxin levels in patients with primary dysmenorrhea［J］.Journal of Pain Research, 2018, 23(11): 611613. ［7］陈欣燕,张嘉文,苏俊杰,等.女性生理周期中医指导原则的拟定与评价 ［J］.广东医学,2017,38(11):16491653. ［8］中华医学会.临床诊疗指南(妇产科学分册)［M］.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:122. ［9］Lefebvre G,Pinsonneault O,Antao V,et al.Primary dysmenorrhea consensus guideline［J］.Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada: JOGC, 2005, 27(12): 11171146. ［10］Ahsin S ,Saleem S ,Bhatti A M , et al.Clinical and endocrinological changes after electroacupuncture treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee ［J］. Pain, 2009, 147(13):6066. ［11］薄智云.腹针无痛治百病［M］.北京:科学普及出版社, 2006:4. ［12］薄智云.腹针疗法 ［M］.北京:中国中医药出版社,2012: 8.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-25