[1]杨琳,张金玲,张立杰,等.Prolift盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂患者 预后影响因素分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(2):46-50.
　YANG Lin,ZHANG Jin-ling,ZHANG Li-jie,et al.Prognostic factors of patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse by prolift pelvic reconstruction[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(2):46-50.
点击复制

Prolift盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂患者 预后影响因素分析
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年2期
页码:
46-50
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2017-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prognostic factors of patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse by prolift pelvic reconstruction
作者:
杨琳; 张金玲; 张立杰; 邵茵*
深圳市人民医院
Author(s):
YANG Lin; ZHANG Jin-ling; ZHANG Li-jie; SHAO Yin*
Department of Gynecology,Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Shenzhen Guangdong 518000,P.R.China
关键词:
Prolift盆底重建术; 重度盆腔器官脱垂; 临床效果; 术后复发
Keywords:
prolift pelvic reconstruction;  severe pelvic organ prolapse;  clinical results;  recurrence
分类号:
R 711.23
摘要:
目的探讨Prolift盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂（pelvic organ prolapse，POP）的临床效果及其术后复发的危险因素。方法选取2013年6月至2015年6月在深圳市人民医院行Prolift盆底重建术治疗的168例POP患者，分别于术前、术后1年应用POP-Q分度法及POP生活质量问卷（P-QOL）对患者POP程度及生活质量进行评价，观察其术后1年复发情况，并应用Cox风险模型分析Prolift盆底重建术治疗POP术后复发的危险因素。结果168例患者治愈率为9405 %（158/168），术后1年复发率为1250 %（20/160）。POP患者术后1年POP-Q分度为Ⅲ~Ⅳ°比例较治疗前显著下降（P<005）。POP患者术后1年脱垂严重程度、个人关系、健康状况、生活状况、角色、体力、社交、情绪、睡眠等方面评分较术前均显著下降（P<005）。经Cox风险模型分析显示，疾病严重程度为Ⅲ~Ⅳ°、脱垂部位为前盆腔、术后阴道壁长度>5 cm是Prolift盆底重建术治疗POP术后复发的独立危险因素。结论Prolift盆底重建术治疗POP可获得较高的治愈率，能有效改善患者术后生活质量。疾病严重程度为Ⅲ~Ⅳ°、脱垂部位为前盆腔、术后阴道壁长度>5 cm是Prolift盆底重建术治疗POP术后复发的独立危险因素，对于具备危险因素的患者术后应加强随访，以降低POP复发率。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effects and risk factors of recurrence of the prolift pelvic reconstruction for severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP).Methods168 cases of POP with prolift pelvic floor reconstruction treatment in Shenzhen People’s Hospital from June 2013 to June 2015 were selected.The POP extent and quality of life of 168 cases were assessed with POP-Q indexing and POP quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) before and 1 year after surgery. To observe the recurrence of 1 year postoperatively, and the risk factors of postoperative recurrence of POP were analyzed by Cox risk model. ResultsThe cure rate of 168 patients was 94.05% (158/168), recurrence rate after 1-year was 1250% (20/160). The Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ ° proportion of POP with prolift pelvic floor reconstruction treatment after one year were significantly lower than before treatment (P<005). Cox analysis showed, the scores of prolapse, personal relationships, health, living conditions, roles, physical, social, emotional, sleep and other aspects one year after treatment were lower than before treatment (P<005).The POP-Q Ⅲ ~ Ⅳ, former site of pelvic prolapse,and vaginal wall length>5cm were independent risk factors of recurrence of POP after prolift reconstructive treatment. ConclusionProlift pelvic reconstruction can improve the cure rate of POP and effectively improve patients’ life quality. Disease severity Ⅲ~Ⅳ°, the former site of pelvic prolapse and vaginal wall length>5cm are independent risk factors for recurrence of POP after prolift pelvic reconstruction.Postoperative follow-up should be strengthened to reduce the recurrence rate.

参考文献/References:

［1］李宝恒，黄惠娟，宋岩峰改良Prolift盆底重建术在治疗合并子宫颈延长的重度盆腔器官脱垂患者中的应用 ［J］中华妇产科杂志，2016，51（3）：174-179 ［2］王冰玉盆腔重建Prolift手术对老年女性重度盆腔器官脱垂的临床疗效 ［J］中国老年学杂志，2014，4（21）：6201-6202 ［3］王宇，杨俊芳，韩劲松，等重度盆腔器官脱垂患者选择手术治疗或子宫托治疗的影响因素 ［J］中华妇产科杂志，2015，7（2）：112-115 ［4］赵英，鲁永鲜，王文英重度盆腔器官脱垂患者治疗方案选择的相关因素分析 ［J］中国妇幼健康研究，2016，27（3）：354-356 ［5］李书卫，金松采用POP-Q分度法观察产前与产后妇女盆腔脏器脱垂46例临床分析 ［J］海南医学院学报，2006，12（5）：430-432 ［6］王建六，曹冬，张晓红，等北京郊区女性尿失禁及盆腔脏器脱垂发病情况及其对生活质量影响的抽样调查 ［J］中国妇产科临床杂志，2007，8（1）：5-9 ［7］HUANG Wen-chu, LIN T Y, LAU H H, et al Outcome of transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery with prolift after a median of 2 years' follow-up ［J］. International Urogynecology Journal, 2011, 22 (2): 197-203. ［8］高霞，张红宇全盆底重建术与传统阴式修补术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的近期疗效观察 ［J］河北医学，2014，7（10）：1625-1628 ［9］SU T H, LAU H H, HUANG Wen-chu, et al. Short term impact on female sexual function of pelvic floor reconstruction with the prolift procedure ［J］. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2009, 6 (11): 3201-3207. ［10］易思捷，熊员焕3种不同术式治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的临床观察 ［J］中国妇幼保健，2015，30（16）：2579-2582 ［11］NEUMAN M, FRIEDMAN M. Advanced mesh implants for vaginal pelvic floor reconstruction: report of 100 prolift operations ［J］. Harefuah, 2007, 146 (12): 923-927, 999-1000. ［12］GRIEBLING T L. Re: risk factors for recurrence after Le fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women ［J］. The Journal of Urology, 2016, 195 (5)： 1543-1545. ［13］SUN Zhixing, ZHU Lan, XU Tao, et al. Effects of preoperative vaginal estrogen therapy for the incidence of mesh complication after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in postmenopausal women: is it helpful or a myth? A 1-year randomized controlled trial ［J］. Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2016, 23 (7)： 740-748. ［14］DAMIANI G R, RIVA D, PELLEGRINO A, et al. Conventional fascial technique versus mesh repair for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: Analysis of recurrences in treated and untreated compartments ［J］. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology： the Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2016, 36 (3)： 410-415. ［15］KRISSI H, AVIRAM A, EITAN R, et al. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women ［J］. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), 2015, 20 (4)： 75-79.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄润强*,杨帆,方彩云,等.全盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的近期疗效 及安全性分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(2):51.
　HUANG Run-qiang*,YANG Fan,FANG Cai-yun,et al.Recent effectiveness and safety analysis of total pelvic reconstruction surgery for repair of severe pelvic organ prolapse[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(2):51.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-25