[1]徐静,马彦彦*.初产妇头位难产诊断中新旧产程图的对比研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(4):34-37.
　XU Jing,MA Yan-yan*.Comparsion of new labor curve with Friedman curve in the diagnosis of cephalic presentation dystocia in primipara[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(4):34-37.
点击复制

初产妇头位难产诊断中新旧产程图的对比研究
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年4期
页码:
34-37
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2017-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparsion of new labor curve with Friedman curve in the diagnosis of cephalic presentation dystocia in primipara
作者:
徐静; 马彦彦*
清华大学玉泉医院妇产科
Author(s):
XU Jing; MA Yan-yan*
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics，Yuquan Hospital of Tsinghua University，Peking 100041，P.R.China
关键词:
头位难产; 初产妇; 产程图; 产程处理; 剖宫产率
Keywords:
cephalic presentation dystocia ;  primipara;  labor curve; labor process;  cesarean delivery rate
分类号:
R 714.44
摘要:
目的探讨初产妇头位难产诊断中新旧产程图应用的对比研究。 方法选取2013年9月至2015年8月在清华大学玉泉医院产科病房的212例头位难产初产妇，根据产程图分为新产程图组和旧产程图组，比较两组产程时间、产科干预措施、临床表现及妊娠结局。结果新产程图组第一产程和第二产程均较旧产程图组有显著变化，产科干预措施明显减少、剖宫产率有所降低，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；产妇临床表现两组差异无统计学意义（P＞005）。 结论采用新产程图处理头位难产初产妇能降低剖宫产率、减少产科干预措施，有助于对初产妇头位难产做出及早的诊断。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo assess the comparsion of new labor curve with Friedman curve in the diagnosis of cephalic presentation dystocia in primipara. Methods212 primipara with cephalic presentation dystocia in Yuquan Hospital of Tsinghua University from September 2013 to August 2015 were selected and divided into two groups according to different labor curves they used. One group was evaluated with new labor curve, while the other group was evaluated with Friedman labor curve. The time of labor stage, intervening measure, clinical feature and pregnancy outcome of the two groups were compared. ResultsThe first and second stages of the group evaluated with new labor curve were significantly different from the group evaluated with Friedman labor curve.The intervening measures were less used when in the group evaluated with new labor curve.Cesarean delivery rate also decreased in this group. ConclusionUsing the new labor curve may decrease the cesarean delivery rate and other intervening measures in delivery. And the new labor curve is much more useful in the early diagnosis of cephalic presentation dystocia in primipara.

参考文献/References:

［1］谢幸，苟文丽．妇产科学［M］．第8版．北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：178． ［2］中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组．新产程标准及处理的专家共识 (2014) ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49 （7）：486． ［3］漆洪波，杨慧霞，段涛．关注和采纳正常产程和产程异常的新标准 ［J］．中华妇产科杂志，2014，49 （7）：487-489． ［4］石广秀．初产妇出现头位难产的原因及处理措施研究 ［J］．大家健康（学术版），2014 ，8 （7）：203-204． ［5］余红琴．初产妇头位难产1 200例分析及处理体会 ［J］．中国美容医学，2012，21 （10）：84-85． ［6］陈叙．产程图应用的历史现状及展望 ［J］．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2015，31 （2）：165-168． ［7］陈笑云，廖义清．初产妇头位难产产程图曲线异常的原因及处理 ［J］．中华现代妇产科学杂志，2009，6 （6）：352-353． ［8］曹玉莲．头位难产诊治规范 ［C］//《中国妇幼健康研究》杂志“妇产科危重症诊治规范”国际研讨会暨“母婴安全”学术论坛论文集，西安，2009． ［9］秦晓艳．头位难产的早期诊断与处理对减少产伤的意义 ［J］．中外医疗，2014，33 （29）：70-71． ［10］王莉，申艳．产程图在头位难产中的应用 ［J］．蚌埠医学院学报，1999，24 （6）：437-438． ［11］吴智玉，邵琦．产程图结合头位分娩评分在头位难产中的应用［J］．陕西医学杂志，2006，35 （2）：155-156． ［12］周红，吴自平．产程图在头位分娩中的应用 ［J］．中国医学创新，2010，7 （4）：31． ［13］古丽娜，阿丽亚，张璟．产程图在初产妇头位难产中的应用价值 ［J］．中国误诊学杂志，2003，3 （8）：1196-1197． ［14］张友秀．192例初产妇头位难产产程图分析 ［J］．现代中西医结合杂志，2006，15 （6）：757-758． ［15］ZHANG Jun, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women ［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 187(4): 824-828. ［16］ZHANG Jun, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes ［J］. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 116(6): 1281-1287. ［17］Laughon SK, Berghella V, Sundaram R, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor ［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208(1, S): S149. ［18］Grantz KL, Gonzalez-Quintero V, Troendle J, et al. Labor patterns in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean with normal neonatal outcomes ［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 213(2): 226.e1-226.e6. ［19］Norman SM, Tuuli MG, AO, et al. The effects of obesity on the first stage of labor ［J］. Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 120(1): 130-135.

相似文献/References:

[1]邹晓萍*,邹晓文,刘传丽,等.35岁以上初产妇不良妊娠结局及其相关危险因素分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(3):57.
　ZOU Xiao-ping*,ZOU Xiao-wen,LIU Chuan-li,et al.Analysis of adverse pregnancy outcome and related risk factors in primipara over 35 years old[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):57.
[2]吕海荣,刘葵,刘晶*.自由体位分娩对初产妇分娩结局的影响研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(5):77.
　LV Hai-rong,LIU Kui,LIU Jing*.The effect of free posture delivery on the outcome of primipara[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):77.
[3]刘爱凤*,李长忠.不同第二产程时间对自然分娩的单胎足月妊娠 初产妇盆底功能的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(10):81.
　LIU Ai-feng*,LI Chang-zhong.The influence of different secondary labor time on pelvic floor function of full-term singleton primipara with natural childbirth assisted by labor analgesia[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):81.
[4]王琳蕊*,于丁一,李月.围产期情绪评估及管理对初产妇产后抑郁和分娩结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(2):74.
　WANG Lin-rui*,YU Ding-yi,LI Yue.Effect of perinatal emotional assessment and management on postpartum depression and delivery outcome in primiparas[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(4):74.
[5]袁嘉琪,杨晓敏,范建霞,等.留置尿管治疗产后尿潴留发生二次置管的危险因素分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(8):29.
　YUAN Jiaqi,YANG Xiaomin,FAN Jianxia,et al.Risk factors of repeat catheterization in indwelling catheter for postpartum urinary retention[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(4):29.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-04-25