[1]辜定纤.经腹腔镜与经阴道宫颈环扎术对宫颈机能不全患者妊娠结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(8):66-68.
　GU Ding-qian.Effect of laparoscopic and transvaginal cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome in patients with cervical incompetence[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(8):66-68.
点击复制

经腹腔镜与经阴道宫颈环扎术对宫颈机能不全患者妊娠结局的影响
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年8期
页码:
66-68
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of laparoscopic and transvaginal cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome in patients with cervical incompetence
作者:
辜定纤
成都市妇女儿童中心医院妇产科
Author(s):
GU Ding-qian
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Chengdu Women's & Children's central Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 610000,P.R.China
关键词:
宫颈环扎; 腹腔镜; 宫颈机能不全; 妊娠结局; 新生儿存活率
Keywords:
cervial cerclage; laparoscope;  cervial incompetence; pregnancy outcome; neonatal survival rate
分类号:
R 713.4
摘要:
目的探讨经腹腔镜与经阴道宫颈环扎术对宫颈机能不全患者妊娠结局的影响。方法回顾性分析 2013~2016年成都市妇女儿童中心医院宫颈机能不全患者43例的临床资料，根据手术方法不同分为两组，观察组(28例)采用经腹腔镜下宫颈环扎术，对照组（15例）采用经阴道宫颈环扎术。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、妊娠结局、新生儿存活率、终止妊娠孕周等情况。结果两组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞005）；观察组患者术后流产率（107 %）、早产率（179 %）低于对照组（333 %、40 0 %），差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；新生儿存活率（75 0 %）及分娩孕周≥37周率（714 %）、分娩平均孕周(3616±445）周高于对照组［267 %、267 %、（3027±483）周］，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）。结论腹腔镜下宫颈环扎术能有效改善宫颈机能不全患者预后，对延长孕周，改善新生儿结局有显著效果。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo discuss the effect of laparoscopic and transvaginal cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome in patients with cervical incompetence.MethodsThe data of 43 patients with cervical incompetence in Chengdu Women's & Children's Central Hospital from 2013 to 2016 were retrospective analyzed and divided into observation group(28 cases)and control group(15 cases) according to different surgical methods. Patients in the observation group received cervical cerclage with therapeutic laparoscopy，and patients in the control group received transvaginal cervical cerclage. The operation time，the blood transfusion,the pregnancy outcomes, neonatal survival rates and the gestational weeks of termination of pregnancy.etc in both groups were compared. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups(P>005);patients in the observation group were significantly lower in abortion rates(07 %)and premature delivery rate(179 %)after surgery in comparison of the patients in the control group(333 %,400 %),the differences were statistically significant(P<005); the survival rate of newborns in the observation group(750 %) and the gestational weeks≥37 weeks(714 %) and the average gestational weeks(3616±445) were significantly higher than those in the control group(267 %, 267 %, 3027±483). The differences were statistically significant(P<005). ConclusionCervical cerclage with therapeutic laparoscopy could effectively improve the prognosis of patients with cervical incompetence, and also helps to prolong gestational weeks and improve neonatal outcomes with satisfactory effects.

参考文献/References:

［1］夏恩兰孕前腹腔镜子宫颈峡部环扎术 ［J］中华腔镜外科杂志（电子版），2012，5（2）：4-6 ［2］王晓怡，陈敦金宫颈机能不全的孕前诊断方法及评价 ［J］中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2014，30（2）：225-227 ［3］姜红叶，陈淑琴，陈玉清，等腹腔镜下宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全16 例临床分析 ［J］中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2012,28（4）：300-302. ［4］McDonald IA Suture of the cervix for intevitable miscarriage ［J］ Obstet Gynecol Br Emp，1957，64: 346-350. ［5］夏恩兰，刘玉环，黄晓武，等孕前环扎带腹腔镜宫颈环扎术［J］ 中华临床医师杂志（电子版），2011，5（12）: 3635-3637. ［6］雷庆华，柯青霞，赖葵凤，等. 孕前腹腔镜子宫峡部环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全的临床研究 ［J］. 中国现代医生，2016，54（23）：43-45. ［7］Kjllesdal M,Nielsen S,Atjerndahl JH,et al.Laparoscopic cervico-uterine cerclage using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of cervical incompetence［J］.Acta Obstet Gynecol Acand,2015,84（8）:823-824. ［8］Carter JF, Soper DE. Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage［J］.JSLS, 2007, 11（3）:375-377. ［9］Scarantino SE, Reilly JG, Moretti ML, et al. Laparoscopic removal of a transabdominal cervical cerclage［J］. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,182（5）: 1086-1088. ［10］姚书忠，姜红叶.腹腔镜下子宫峡部环扎术　［J］. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2014，30（2）:102-105.

相似文献/References:

[1]喻海芬,熊毅刚.腹腔镜诊治计划生育手术并发症32例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
[2]张榑,马葆荣,薛润清,等.子宫肌瘤切除三种术式临床效果比较[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(02):0.
　ZHANG Fu,MA Bao-rong,XUE Run-qing.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(8):0.
[3]刘彩艳.宫角妊娠34例诊治分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[4]吕建利,郑红艳.腹腔镜治疗卵巢成熟性囊性畸胎瘤42例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
[5]宋治兰,贺进,钱碧慧,等.腹腔镜辅助盆底重建术治疗子宫脱垂的临床疗效分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(05):0.
　SONG Zhi-lan,HE Jin,QIAN Bi-hui.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(8):0.
[6]蒋芝蓉,罗光楠.腹腔镜下腹膜阴道成形术342例报道[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　JIANG Zhi-rong,LUO Guang-nan.Chengdu Sunshine Gynecology Hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 00,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(8):0.
[7]刘莉.腹腔镜下不同术式子宫肌瘤切除术51例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(01):0.
　LIU Li.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(8):0.
[8]马建婷,杨春林,苏雪锋,等.腹腔镜子宫内膜异位囊肿剔除术两种止血方法对年轻患者卵巢储备功能的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
　MA Jian-ting,YANG Chun-lin,SU Xue-feng,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(8):0.
[9]黄文华.腹腔镜下全子宫切除术的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
[10]林永红,李万珍,刘莉,等.悬吊式无气腹腹腔镜巨大子宫肌瘤切除术的初步观察及文献复习[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　LIN Yong-hong,LI Wan-zhen,LIU Li,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(8):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-25