[1]蒙燕燕,卢建军,吕丽岭*.经腹与经会阴超声对剖宫产后经产妇子宫下段扫查效果的对比[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(10):68-70.
　MENG Yan-yan,LU Jian-jun,LV Li-ling*.Comparison of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound in the scanning of lower uterine segments in parturients after cesarean section[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(10):68-70.
点击复制

经腹与经会阴超声对剖宫产后经产妇子宫下段扫查效果的对比
分享到：

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年10期
页码:
68-70
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-10-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound in the scanning of lower uterine segments in parturients after cesarean section
作者:
蒙燕燕; 卢建军; 吕丽岭*
内蒙古医科大学附属医院妇产科
Author(s):
MENG Yan-yan; LU Jian-jun; LV Li-ling*
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Affiliatd Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot Inner Mongolia 010050,P.R.China
关键词:
剖宫产; 经产妇; 子宫下段; 经腹超声; 经会阴超声
Keywords:
caesarean section; multipara; lower uterine segment; transabdominal ultrasound; transperineal ultrasound
分类号:
R 445.1
摘要:
目的探讨经腹与经会阴超声对剖宫产后经产妇子宫下段扫查效果。方法 选取2015年4月至2017年6月内蒙古医科大学附属医院收治的236例中晚孕期经产孕妇，根据孕妇上次妊娠分娩方式分组， 126例剖宫产孕妇为研究组，110例阴道分娩孕妇为对照组。两组孕妇分别采用经腹与经会阴超声检查，对比不同检查方式对孕妇子宫下段的检查效果。结果研究组和对照组经腹检查达到理想情况率分别为9683 %和9636 %，显著高于经会阴检查达到理想情况率（3492 %，3455 %）（P＜005）。随着孕龄的增加，两组孕妇的子宫前壁下段厚度均逐渐变薄（P＜005）；在相同孕龄时，对照组孕妇的子宫前壁下段厚度均厚于研究组孕妇（P＜005）。在126例研究组孕妇中，只有1111 %的孕妇能够通过超声检查辨认出瘢痕位置，其余8889 %则无法确认瘢痕位置。结论超声检查能够较好地反映出孕妇子宫下段情况，但是不能作为预测孕妇阴道试产安全的依据；对剖宫产术后再次妊娠的中晚期孕妇，采取经腹超声检查其子宫下段比经会阴超声检查具有更好的效果。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound on the scanning of lower uterine segment in parturients after cesarean section. MethodsSelected 236 cases of middle-late pregnancy multigravida in the Affiliated Hospital Inner Mongolia Medical University from April 2015 to June 2017,according to the way of last delivery mode, 126 cases of cesarean section pregnant women were divided into study group, 110 cases of vaginal delivery pregnant women were divided into control group.The two groups of pregnant women were treated by transabdominal and perineal ultrasonography, compared the effect of different screening methods in examining lower uterine segment. ResultsIn the study group and the control group, the ideal rate of transabdominal examination was 9683 % and 9636 % respectively, which was significantly higher than that of the transperineal examination (3492 %， 3455 %) (P<005).With the gradual increase of gestational age, the thickness of lower anterior wall of the uterus of the two groups gradually became thinner (P<005). At the same gestational age, the thickness of lower anterior wall of the uterus in the control group was thicker than that of the study group（P＜005）.In 126 cases of pregnant women in study group, only 1111 % of pregnant women by ultrasound can identify scar location, the remaining 8889 % were unable to confirm the position of the scar. ConclusionUltrasound can reflect the status of the lower uterine segment well, but can not be used as a basis for predicting the safety of vaginal delivery; for re-pregnant women after cesarean section after the second trimester, transabdominal ultrasonography has better feasibility in examining the lower uterine segment than transperineal ultrasound.

参考文献/References:

［1］张苗，汪彩英，李霞．超声对剖宫产后再次妊娠中晚孕期孕妇子宫下段的观察研究 ［J］．中国医疗设备，2016，31（7）：58-60． ［2］Jeong SY, Sung SI, Sung JH, et al. MERS-CoV infection in a pregnant woman in Korea ［J］. J Korean Med Sci, 2017, 32 (10): 1717-1720. ［3］侯秀敏，王荣，沈培璞，等．经腹与经阴道超声在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断及介入治疗中的应用 ［J］．徐州医学院学报，2013，33（10）：641-644． ［4］Visayaragawan N, Selvarajah N, Apparau H, et al. Bohring-opitz syndrome-A case of a rare genetic disorder ［J］. Med J Malaysia, 2017, 72 (4): 248-249. ［5］闫凤芝，闫艳，司彩凤，等．超声下剖宫产宫壁瘢痕缺损的形态学改变与异常子宫出血的相关性 ［J］．实用预防医学，2016，23（4）：467-469． ［6］梁星新，王保钢，杜联芳．经阴道超声诊断子宫切口瘢痕妊娠的影响因素分析 ［J］．蚌埠医学院学报，2015，40（5）：668-669, 675． ［7］Duggappa DR, Lokesh M, Dixit A, et al. Perfusion index as a predictor of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in lower segment caesarean section ［J］. Indian J Anaesth, 2017, 61 (8): 649-654. ［8］杨佳丽，梁淑仪，洪碧珊．经会阴超声对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的观察及评估分析 ［J］．医学影像学杂志，2017，27（2）：382-384． ［9］张祥玲，赵佩英．阴道分娩和剖宫产对妇女前盆腔短期影响的会阴超声研究 ［J］．全科医学临床与教育，2017，15（1）：46-48． ［10］Ashida S, Hirate Y, Yano D, et al. Fifteen-year follow-up of a patient with aortitis, treated by sino-tubular junction plication using a prosthetic tube graft for aortic regurgitation:Report of a case ［J］. Kyobu Geka, 2017,70 (10):867-870. ［11］Soltani F, Eskandari Z, Khodakarami B, et al. Factors contributing to fear of childbirth among pregnant women in Hamadan(Iran) in 2016 ［J］. Electron Physician, 2017, 9 (7): 4725-4731. ［12］Yaln M, rkmez M, Tayfur KD, et al. Postpartum aortic dissection in a patient without Marfan's syndrome ［J］. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 13 (4): 212-214. ［13］Fonseca A, Silva R, Rato I, et al. Breech presentation: vaginal versus cesarean delivery, which intervention leads to the best outcomes? ［J］. Acta Med Port, 2017, 30 (6): 479-484. ［14］陈艳，王竞宇，叶德华，等．经会阴超声评估不同分娩方式对产后盆底组织功能的近期影响 ［J］．西部医学，2014，26（12）：1692-1695． ［15］Juneja SK, Tandon P, Kochhar B, et al. A rare case of transvesical cesarean section ［J］. Int J Appl Basic Med Res, 2017, 7 (3): 205-206. ［16］杨超，涂艳萍，陈文芬，等．阴式超声联合宫腔镜诊治剖宫产后子宫憩室的临床分析［J］．医学影像学杂志，2014，24（12）：2236-2238． ［17］ZHOU Chi, ZOU Qing-yun, LI Hua, et al. Preeclampsia downregulates MicroRNAs in fetal endothelial cells: roles of miR-29a/c-3p in endothelial function ［J］. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2017, 102 (9): 3470-3479. ［18］Yüksel D, Yüce T, Kalafat E, et al. The views of nulliparous pregnant women on the types of delivery ［J］. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 13 (3): 127-131. ［19］赖筱琍，金海红，黄玲飞．不同超声类型剖宫产瘢痕处妊娠87例分析 ［J］．全科医学临床与教育，2017，15（1）：79-81． ［20］周琴，高勇，谢建明，等．超声检查在孕晚期子宫下段瘢痕的应用价值再探讨 ［J］．医学信息，2015，28（4）：208．

相似文献/References:

[1]刘素琼,乔莉,余劲,等.产后出血相关因素分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(05):0.
　LIU Su-qiong,QIAO Li,YU Jin The department of gynaecology and obstetrics,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2009,(10):0.
[2]卢庆.前壁前置胎盘剖宫产术31例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
　LU Qing.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2009,(10):0.
[3]曾梦艳,廖滔.HIV感染孕产妇剖宫产48例情况分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
[4]刘颖.82例中央性前置胎盘的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(02):0.
[5]李波.161例产后出血的原因分析及预防[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
　LI Bo Intensive care unit,Chengdu gynaecology and obstetrics hospital,Chengdu Sichuan 00,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(10):0.
[6]陈倩,段成城,全望华,等.欣母沛、葡萄糖酸钙和缩宫素联合预防剖宫产产后出血疗效观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
　CHEN Qian,DUAN Cheng-cheng,QUAN Wang-hua,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(10):0.
[7]莫丽芳.剖宫产手术中行子宫肌瘤剔除术体会[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(04):0.
　MO Li-fang Shilong Peoples hospital of Dongguan city,Dongguan Guangdong,China.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(10):0.
[8]解秀珍.妊娠相关性血小板减少症39例临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2010,(05):0.
　XIE Xiu-zhen.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2010,(10):0.
[9]周学敏.剖宫产子宫肌层单层缝合效果观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　ZHOU Xue-min.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(10):0.
[10]王晓枚,舒小兰,王瑛,等.剖宫产使用镇痛泵术后的舒适护理[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(04):0.
　WANG Xiao-mei,SHU Xiao-lan,WANG Ying,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(10):0.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-25