[1]史颖,李晓娟*.两种术前新辅助化疗给药方式对ⅠB2~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者手术相关临床指标水平、生存时间及毒副作用的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(8):86-89.
 SHI Ying,LI Xiao-juan*.Influence of two ways of drug delivery of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the operation-related clinical index, survival time and adverse reaction of patients with cervical cancer for Ⅰ B2~Ⅱ A2 stage[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(8):86-89.
点击复制

两种术前新辅助化疗给药方式对ⅠB2~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者手术相关临床指标水平、生存时间及毒副作用的影响
分享到:

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年8期
页码:
86-89
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2018-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of two ways of drug delivery of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the operation-related clinical index, survival time and adverse reaction of patients with cervical cancer for Ⅰ B2~Ⅱ A2 stage
作者:
史颖李晓娟*
陕西中医药大学第二附属医院妇二科
Author(s):
SHI YingLI Xiao-juan*
Second Department of Gynecology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Xianyang Shaanxi 712000,P.R.China
关键词:
新辅助化疗静脉滴注动脉介入栓塞宫颈癌
Keywords:
neoadjuvant chemotherapy intravenous arterial intervention cervical cancer
分类号:
R 737.33
摘要:
目的探讨术前静脉滴注与动脉介入栓塞化疗对ⅠB2~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者手术相关临床指标水平、生存时间及毒副作用的影响。方法选取2012年3月至2014年3月陕西中医药大学第二附属医院收治的ⅠB2-ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者80例,按给药方式分为静脉组(40例)和动脉组(40例),分别在术前给予静脉滴注和动脉介入栓塞化疗。比较两组患者手术相关临床指标水平,客观缓解率,疾病控制率,随访生存率、复发转移率及毒副作用发生率。结果动脉组患者第一次化疗后可手术率高于静脉组,术前住院时间和化疗至手术时间短于静脉组,总治疗费用高于静脉组,患者Ⅲ-Ⅳ度消化道反应和骨髓抑制发生率低于静脉组,以上各项两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<005);两组患者新辅助化疗客观缓解率、疾病控制率、生存率和复发转移率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>005)。结论ⅠB2~Ⅱ A2期宫颈癌患者行术前静脉滴注与动脉介入栓塞化疗后临床疗效较为接近;动脉介入栓塞方式给药可有效缩短化疗时间,早期完成手术治疗,避免严重毒副作用发生,但可能增加患者经济负担。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of different preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy(intravenous infusion and arterial embolization)on the operation-related clinical index, survival time and adverse reaction of patients with cervical cancer for Ⅰ B2-Ⅱ A2 stage. Methods80 patients with cervical cancer for ⅠB2-ⅡA2 stage in Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2012 to March 2014 were chosen and divided into intravenous group (40 cases) and arterial group (40 cases) by different drug delivery methods. Two groups were given intravenous infusion and arterial embolization chemotherapy respectively before surgery. The levels of surgically related clinical indicators, objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), follow-up survival rate, recurrence and metastasis rate, and the incidence of toxic and side effects were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe surgery rate of patients in the arterial group after the first chemotherapy was higher than that in the intravenous group. Preoperative hospital stay and chemotherapy to operation time were shorter than those in the intravenous group. The total cost of treatment was higher than that of the intravenous group. Patients with III-IV gastrointestinal reactions and myelosuppression occurring rate in the arterial group were lower than the intravenous group(P<005). There was no significant difference in objective remission rate, disease control rate, survival rate and recurrence and metastasis rate between the two groups (P>005). ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of preoperative intravenous infusion and arterial embolization chemotherapy in patients with stage I B2 to II A2 cervical cancer is relatively close; arterial interventional embolization can effectively shorten the chemotherapy time, complete surgical treatment early, to avoid serious side effects, but it may increase the economic burden on patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨学刚,周石,吴戈,等介入动脉灌注化疗联合放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的临床疗效研究 [J]中华放射学杂志,2013,47(9):840-842 [2]Eskander RN, Tewari KS. Chemotherapy in the treatment of etastatic,persistent,and recurrent cervical cancer [J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 26(4): 314-321. [3]Garcia LM, Hemmelgarn M, Pineda E, et al. Cervical cancer treatment and survivorship needs:The patient's perspective [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 133(Suppl 1): 51-52. [4]Chen SJ, Kuo CC, Pan HY, et al. Mechanistic basis of a combination D-penicillamine and platinum drugs synergistically inhibits tumor growth in oxaliplatin-resistant human cervical cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2015, 95(1): 28-37. [5]陈惠祯,蔡红兵现代妇科肿瘤学 [M]湖北:科学技术出版社,2006:206-207 [6]汤钊猷现代肿瘤学 [M]第2版上海:上海医科大学出版社,2000:3-10 [7]Phua VC, Wong WQ, TAN Pei-lin, et al. Capecitabine pattern of usage, rate of febrile neutropaenia and treatment related death in Asian cancer patients in clinical practice [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2015, 16(4): 1449-1453. [8]Hosaka M, Watari H, Kato T, et al. Clinical efficacy of paclitaxel/cisplatin as an adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2012, 105(6): 612-616. [9]WEI Li-chun, WANG Ning, SHI Mei, et al. Clinical outcome observation of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy/radiotherapy alone in 174 Chinese patients with local advanced cervical carcinoma [J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2013, 6(6): 67-74. [10]Fornage BD, Hwang RF. Current status of imaging-guided percutaneous ablation of breast cancer [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 203(2): 442-448. [11]Limani K, Aoun F, Holz S, et al. Single high intensity focused ultrasound session as a whole gland primary treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer:10-year outcomes [J]. Prostate Cancer, 2014, 20(14): 186782. [12]Moyer VA, U. S.preventive services task force.Screening for cervical cancer:U.S.preventive services task force recommendation statement [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2014, 160(1): 55-60. [13]Abe A, Furumoto H, Nishimura M, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer with lymphadenopathy [J]. Oncol Lett, 2012, 3(3): 571-576. [14]YIN Mingzhu, ZHANG Haiyu, LI Huiyan, et al. The toxicity and long-term efficacy of nedaplatin and paclitaxel treatment as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. J Surg Oncol, 2012, 105(2): 206-211. [15]Motoyama S, Humana S, KU Y, et al. Neoadjuvant high-dose intraarterial infusion chemotherapy under percutaneous pelvic perfusion with extracorporeal chemofiltration in patients withstages Ⅲa-Ⅳa cervical cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2012, 95(3): 576-582. [16]YU Ting-he, FU Xiao. Extracorporeal ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: implications from the present clinical trials [J]. Scientific World Journal, 20(14): 537260.

相似文献/References:

[1]李菁,沈立翡,朱岚,等.新辅助化疗联合间隔减瘤术在晚期卵巢癌中的临床应用研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(11):0.
 LI Jing,SHEN Li-fei,ZHU Lan,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(8):0.
[2]綦小蓉 综述,何跃东* 审校.晚期卵巢癌选择初始肿瘤细胞减灭术还是间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术探析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(4):26.
[3]杨辰敏,冯炜炜,蔡蕾*.放化疗和手术的不同组合在治疗ⅡB~ⅣA期 宫颈癌的研究进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(6):30.
[4]朵雪莲*,马梅艳,白盖措.盆腔淋巴结切除数目对不同治疗方案的宫颈癌患者无进展生存时间的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(9):47.
 DUO Xue-lian*,MA Mei-yan,BAI Gai-cuo.Effect of number of pelvic lymph node resection on progression-free survival of cervical cancer patients with different treatment regimens[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(8):47.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
陕西省自然基金(项目编号:2016JQ2131)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-25