[1]陶晓玲,熊俊*,董毅,等.Logistics回归分析剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗后再入院治疗的影响因素及不同治疗方案的最佳获益人群[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(2):64-68.
 TAO Xiao-ling,XIONG Jun*,DONG Yi,et al.Logistics regression analysis of the influencing factors of re-admission treatment after caesarean section scar pregnancy treatment and the best benefit group of different treatment options[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(2):64-68.
点击复制

Logistics回归分析剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗后再入院治疗的影响因素及不同治疗方案的最佳获益人群
分享到:

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
64-68
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2020-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Logistics regression analysis of the influencing factors of re-admission treatment after caesarean section scar pregnancy treatment and the best benefit group of different treatment options
作者:
陶晓玲熊俊* 董毅方敏
湖北省妇幼保健院妇科
Author(s):
TAO Xiao-ling XIONG Jun* DONG Yi FANG Min
Department of Gynaecology, Hubei Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Wuhan Hubei 430070,P.R.China
关键词:
瘢痕妊娠清宫术孕周囊胚大小瘢痕厚度
Keywords:
scar pregnancy curettage gestational age embryo sac size scar thickness
分类号:
R 7138
摘要:
目的采用Logistics回归分析剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗后再入院治疗的影响因素及不同治疗方案的最佳获益人群。方法收集湖北省妇幼保健院2016年4月至2018年4月收治的430例剖宫产瘢痕妊娠患者临床资料,根据患者治疗后是否再次入院治疗分为未再次入院组(389例)和再次入院组(41例)。采用复方米非司酮联合米索前列醇进行药物流产后联合B超引导下刮宫术治疗的患者为A方法组,共240例;采用双侧子宫动脉栓塞术联合甲氨蝶呤动脉灌注化疗联合B超引导下刮宫术为B方法组,共190例。分别采用单因素方差分析、Logistic
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo use logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors of re-admission treatment after caesarean section scar pregnancy treatment and the best benefit groups of different treatment options.MethodsThe clinical data of 430 patients with caes

参考文献/References:

[1]Di S S A, Saccone G, Mccurdy R, et al. Risk of cesarean scar defect in single- versus double-layer uterine closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017, 50(5):578-583. [2]周逸雪,林英,李云云.子宫瘢痕部位妊娠诊治现状及研究进展 [J].中国妇幼保健,2018,33(12):2869-2873. [3]金力, 陈蔚琳, 周应芳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊治专家共识(2016) [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(8):5-9. [4]Sturzenegger K, Schffer L, Zimmermann R, et al. Risk factors of uterine rupture with a special interest to uterine fundal pressure [J]. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2016, 45(3):309-313. [5] Calì G, Timor-Trisch I E, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2018, 51(2) :169-175. [6]屈在卿, 马润玫, 杜明钰,等. 剖宫产瘢痕子宫妊娠孕中期引产方法的探讨 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2016, 32(1):77-79. [7]毕娟, 洪向丽. 超声测量中晚期子宫瘢痕前壁下段厚度对阴道试产及先兆子宫破裂的临床意义 [J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2016, 8(5):55-57. [8]王新彦, 李洪霞, 冀涛. 不同程度瘢痕子宫对再次妊娠子宫下段厚度及分娩方式选择的影响 [J]. 医学综述, 2017, 23(4):814-816. [9]郭培培,余照娟,黄苗苗,等.不孕症合并瘢痕子宫患者胚胎解冻移植周期妊娠结局分析 [J].安徽医科大学学报,2017,52(12):1876-1879. [10] Whittington C M, O'Meally D, Laird M K, et al. Transcriptomic changes in the pre-implantation uterus highlight histotrophic nutrition of the developing marsupial embryo [J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):2412. [11]含笑, 余梁, 王国亮,等. 子宫动脉栓塞术对子宫瘢痕妊娠疗效观察及影响因素分析 [J]. 安徽医药, 2016, 20(4):751-753. [12]李红侠,杨悦.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠52例临床分析 [J].中国医疗设备,2017,32(S1):82-83. [13]Yan M, Shao M, Shao X. Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(25):e7327. [14]陈雪莲, 钱沁佳. 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠清宫术预后的影响因素分析 [J]. 海南医学, 2017, 28(9):1516-1518.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘义.生化汤配合催产素治疗药物流产后出血的观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(05):0.
[2]王立.药物流产后阴道持续出血清宫时机选择——附74例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2009,(06):0.
 WANG Li The peoples hospital of Henggang region,Shenzhen city,Shenzhen Guangdong 8,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2009,(2):0.
[3]孙广范,林霞,尚雪,等.剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕妊娠的诊断及临床治疗分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(03):0.
 SUN Guang - fan *,LIN Xia,SHANG Xue,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(2):0.
[4]刘欣燕,吴琳琳.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的治疗进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(04):0.
 LIU Xin-yan,WU Lin-lin.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(2):0.
[5]何双,顾向应.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的发病率及发病原因分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(04):0.
 HE Shuang,GU Xiang-ying *.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(2):0.
[6]黄海霞,周敏,祝昭惠,等.甲氨蝶呤联合宫腹腔镜监测行刮宫术治疗早期剖宫产瘢痕妊娠21例分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2013,(04):0.
 HUANG Hai-xia *,ZHOU Min,ZHU Zhao-hui,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2013,(2):0.
[7]庞小艳,邓小清,肖翠艳,等.复发性流产患者清宫术中个性化护理的临床观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2014,(08):0.
 PANG Xiao-yan,DENG Xiao-qing,XIAO Cui-yan,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2014,(2):0.
[8]张秀丽,吕化.双侧子宫动脉栓塞联合宫腔镜清宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的效果分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(05):0.
 ZHANG Xiu-li,LV Hua,[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(2):0.
[9]石丽萍,许学岚,曾秀华,等.子宫瘢痕处葡萄胎1例[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(09):0.
[10]陈丽,樊晓君,王莉,等.胎盘植入行经子宫动脉氨甲喋呤灌注、栓塞联合宫腔镜下清宫术的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2016,(01):0.
 CHEN Li,FAN Xiao-jun,WANG Li,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2016,(2):0.
[11]胡桂*,罗丽娟,刘菁.子宫瘢痕妊娠患者子宫动脉化疗栓塞术后不同时机行清宫术治疗效果分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(1):63.
 HU Gui*,LUO Li-juan,LIU Jing.Analysis of application effect of curettage at different time after uterine artery chemoembolization in patients with uterine scar pregnancy[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2019,(2):63.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-25