[1]李萍,赵虎,肖雄,等.不同介入阻断术对凶险性前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(4):41-44.
 LI Ping,ZHAO Hu,XIAO Xiong,et al.Effects of different interventional block surgery on clinical outcomes of patients with dangerous placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(4):41-44.
点击复制

不同介入阻断术对凶险性前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响
分享到:

《中国计划生育和妇产科》[ISSN:1674-4020/CN:51-1708/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年4期
页码:
41-44
栏目:
论著与临床
出版日期:
2020-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different interventional block surgery on clinical outcomes of patients with dangerous placenta previa
作者:
李萍赵虎肖雄王利民*
成都市妇女儿童中心医院产科
Author(s):
LI PingZHAO HuXIAO XiongWANG Limin*
Department of Obstetrics, Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan 610000,P.R.China
关键词:
凶险性前置胎盘介入治疗子宫动脉栓塞术腹主动脉球囊阻断术
Keywords:
dangerous placenta previa interventional therapy uterine artery embolizationabdomen aortic balloon occlusion
分类号:
R 71446
摘要:
目的 探究双侧子宫动脉栓塞及腹主动脉球囊阻断术对凶险性前置胎盘患者临床结局的影响。方法 选择2015年7月至2018年3月成都市妇女儿童中心医院收治的凶险性前置胎盘患者纳入研究,其中行双侧子宫动脉栓塞术患35例,纳入栓塞组,行腹主动脉预置球囊阻断术56例,纳入球囊组。比较两组患者围手术期指标及母婴结局指标,随访统计术后并发症发生情况。结果 球囊组患者术中出血量、术后24 h内出血量、输血量、术后出血发生率与栓塞组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>005)。球囊组透视时间、照射剂量、总体手术时间、住院时间、转ICU率、子宫切除率、新生儿窒息发生率及总体并发症发生率均明显低于栓塞组(P<005)。结论 双侧子宫动脉栓塞及腹主动脉球囊阻断均可降低凶险性前置胎盘出血量及子宫切除率;其中腹主动脉球囊阻断可有效缩短手术时间,减少辐射剂量,降低栓塞并发症的发生率,安全性更高。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of bilateral uterine artery embolization and abdomen aortic balloon occlusion on clinical outcomes of patients with dangerous placenta previa. Methods The patients with dangerous placenta previa who were admitted to Chengdu Women and Children's Center Hospital from July 2015 to March 2018 were enrolled. Among them, 35 patients undergoing bilateral uterine artery embolization were included in embolization group. 56 patients undergoing lower abdomen aortic balloon occlusion were included in balloon group. The perioperative indicators and maternal and infant outcome indicators were compared between the two groups of patients, and the postoperative complications were followed up.Results Compared with the embolization group, there were no significant differences in the amount of intraoperative blood loss, blood loss within 24 h after operation, blood transfusion, and postoperative bleeding in the balloon group (P>005). The fluoroscopy time, irradiation dose, total operation time, length of hospital stay, ICU transfer, hysterectomy rate, incidence of neonatal asphyxia, and overall complications were significantly lower in the balloon group than in the embolization group (P<005).Conclusion Both bilateral uterine arterial embolism and abdominal aortic balloon occlusion can reduce the dangerous placental bleeding and hysterectomy rate. Among them, abdominal aortic balloon occlusion can effectively shorten the operation time, reduce radiation dose and reduce the complications of embolization occurrence, with higher safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨凯乐, 刘展, 谢菲,等.前置胎盘并胎盘植入的高危因素及对妊娠结局的影响 [J].实用预防医学, 2018, 25(9):8789. [2]姜子燕, 卢红梅, 张国英,等.凶险型前置胎盘伴植入患者手术方式探讨 [J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,20(12):16251627. [3]黄燕, 杨鹰.子宫动脉栓塞术在凶险型前置胎盘剖宫产中的疗效观察 [J].国际妇产科学杂志, 2014,10(4):426428. [4]陈姣, 熊浩然, 吴晓兰.104例凶险型前置胎盘患者行腹主动脉球囊阻断术对妊娠结局和生育功能的影响 [J].中国性科学, 2017, 26(11):103106. [5]余琳, 胡可佳, 杨慧霞.20082014年凶险性前置胎盘的回顾性临床研究 [J].中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(3):169173. [6]张晨, 李微, 王秀梅,等.介入治疗凶险性前置胎盘两种阻断方法的比较 [J].中国计划生育和妇产科, 2018,10(3):2228. [7]Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.GreenTop guidelines: Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage[R].London,2009. [8]Lee J W, Song I A, Ryu J, et al.Anesthetic management of a parturient with placenta previa totalis undergoing preventive uterine artery embolization before placental expulsion during cesarean delivery: a case report[J].Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2014, 67(4):279282. [9]周冰侠, 刘利, 蒲慧然.腹主动脉球囊阻断术和子宫动脉栓塞术治疗瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘植入的比较研究 [J].中国妇幼健康研究, 2018, 160(8):7174. [10]崔世红, 职云晓, 张凯.腹主动脉球囊阻断术在中央型前置胎盘伴胎盘植入孕妇剖宫产术中的应用 [J].中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(9):672676. [11]刘丽娟, 曹淑新, 桑雪梅,等.子宫动脉栓塞术在穿透性凶险性前置胎盘中的临床应用研究 [J].现代生物医学进展, 2017, 17(6):144146,164. [12]周巾,郭艳萍,季淑英.髂内动脉预置球囊、双侧子宫动脉栓塞对凶险性前置胎盘患者剖宫产术中出血的预防效果比较 [J].山东医药,2017,57(39):5658. [13]Thabet A, Kalva S P, Liu B, et al.Interventional radiology in pregnancy complications: indications, technique, and methods for minimizing radiation exposure [J].Radiographics, 2012, 32(1):255274.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙黎.介入治疗在凶险型前置胎盘合并胎盘植入中的应用[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2011,(02):0.
 SUN Li.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2011,(4):0.
[2]吴雅慧,张维民,宋群霞,等.导丝治疗输卵管阻塞的疗效观察[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,(03):0.
 WU Ya-hui,ZHANG Wei-min,SONG Qun-xia,et al.[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2015,(4):0.
[3]林燕.腹主动脉阻断球囊预植入术对凶险性前置胎盘 剖宫产术中止血情况及手术结局的影响[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(4):38.
 LIN Yan.Effects of pre-implantation of abdominal aortic occlusion balloon on hemostasis and outcome of cesarean section of dangerous placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(4):38.
[4]倪雪梅*,赖微,朱巧英,等.彩超联合甲胎蛋白在孕晚期预测凶险性前置胎盘合并胎盘植入的应用分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(8):53.
 NI Xue-mei*,LAI Wei,ZHU Qiao-ying,et al.Application of color Doppler ultrasonography combined with alpha fetal protein in prediction of placenta previa complicated with placenta accrete in the third trimester[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(4):53.
[5]马俊*,陈葵喜,程珊,等.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗凶险性前置胎盘的应用效果评价[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2017,(11):43.
 MA Jun*,CHEN Kui-xi,CHENG Shan,et al.Evaluation of the effect of uterine artery embolization in the treatment of dangerous placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2017,(4):43.
[6]符式新*,张茜,张凯钟,等.磁共振成像对凶险性前置胎盘的诊断价值分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(6):64.
 FU Shi-xin*,ZHANG Qian,ZHANG Kai-zhong,et al.Analysis of diagnostic value of pernicious placenta previa examined by magnetic resonance imaging[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):64.
[7]曾晓玲,杨慧霞*.环形缝扎联合宫颈球囊压迫成功治疗凶险性前置胎盘伴穿透性胎盘植入侵及宫颈2例[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(9):95.
[8]李万珍,卢晓红,吴晓兰*.凶险性前置胎盘多学科协作诊疗模式临床研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(12):46.
 LI Wan-zhen,LU Xiao-hong,WU Xiao-lan*.Clinical study of multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment mode of pernicious placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):46.
[9]魏云波,张曙萱*.数字减影血管造影引导下低位腹主动脉球囊阻断术在凶险性前置胎盘治疗中的应用研究[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2020,(8):41.
 WEI Yunbo,ZHANG Shuxuan*.Application of digital subtraction angiography guided low abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in the treatment of dangerous placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2020,(4):41.
[10]张晨*,李微,王秀梅,等.介入治疗凶险性前置胎盘两种阻断方法的比较[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2018,(3):65.
 ZHANG Chen*,LI Wei,WANG Xiu-mei,et al.Comparison of two occlusion of interventional treatment methods of pernicious placenta previa[J].Chinese Journal of Family Planning & Gynecotokology,2018,(4):65.
[11]林剑霞,程蔚蔚*.凶险性前置胎盘伴胎盘植入的介入治疗研究进展[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2019,(12):28.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
四川省卫生和计划生育委员会基金课题(项目编号:17PJ256)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-04-25